Law Times

Law Times • February 23, 2009 NEW An online resource tool 1.800.263.3269 Bestcase earlug.indd 1 3/26/08 11:52:01 AM Focus On INTERNATIONAL/CROSS-BORDER LAW Release takes into account technological advances and growth SEC gives guidance what is and isn't permissible BY JULIUS MELNITZER For Law Times I n August 2008 — eight years after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued its last comprehensive guidance on how a company may use its web site to disclose information and communicate with investors — the commission issued an updated interpretive release that takes into account technological advances and growth in Internet usage. "The new release is very sig- nifi cant because it affects so many companies, including New York Stock Exchange-listed companies required to maintain company web sites, companies that choose to use their sites to satisfy SEC disclosure requirements, and companies that maintain sites for a variety of mar- keting or investor relations matters without necessarily considering the securities law implications," says Laura Richman, counsel at Mayer Brown's Chicago offi ce. At the heart of the guidance is a change in the SEC's approach to web site disclosures for the pur- pose of Regulation FD (Fair Dis- closure), which governs selective disclosure and insider trading. "Prior to the current release, the SEC did not recognize web site disclosure, in and of itself, as an adequate public disclosure method under Regulation FD," says William Anderson, a part- ner at Bracewell & Guiliani's Houston offi ce. "Now, however, the SEC agrees that in certain circumstances the posting of in- formation on a company web site may, in and of itself, be a suffi cient method of public disclosure." But there are no hard-and-fast rules. "The SEC is very attuned to the fact that technology has evolved and will continue to evolve, which explains why the release is in the form of principles rather than a bright line test," Richman says. In other words, when push comes to shove, it is the company's responsibility to evaluate whether a posting on its web site will suffi ce for purposes of Regulation FD. Regulation FD does require information to be furnished in a prescribed form in order to avoid selective disclosure con- cerns. But it permits alternative methods of communications reasonably designed to provide broad public distribution. "Distributing a press release through a widely disseminated news service, for example, is gen- erally considered an acceptable method of alternative public dis- closure," Richman says. And now, information posted on web sites can also qualify, but only if the site meets three condi- tions: investors and markets must recognize the site as a channel of distribution of information about the company; posting the informa- tion on the site disseminates it so as to make it available to the secu- rities marketplace in general; and the information has been posted in a timely way that allows investors and the market to react to it. To assist companies to deter- mine whether its postings sat- isfy these requirements, the release provides a non-exclusive list of fac- tors against which companies can evaluate their position. "This list of evaluative fac- tors allows companies to know what balls they're juggling, and that's a very welcome develop- ment in the context of the SEC's recognition that web-based dis- closure can satisfy Regulation FD," Richman says. Some of the factors listed by the SEC are: • whether and how the issuer lets investors and markets know about its web site and where 'Companies are going to have to show that their site is a source of information for inves- tors on a regular basis,' says William Anderson. they should look on the com- pany's site for information; • whether the issuer has made in- vestors and the markets aware that it posts important infor- mation on its site and whether it has a practice of doing so; • whether the design of the site leads users to the relevant information effi ciently and whether the information is prominently disclosed in ap- propriate locations; • whether the market and the media readily access and report the information on the site, or whether the company has ad- vised media about the informa- tion's availability; • whether the web site is widely accessible to the market through RSS feeds or other distribution channels; • whether the site is current and accurate; and • whether the company uses oth- er methods to disseminate the information and the extent to which it uses them. But not everyone is thrilled: some observers say that only the crème de la crème of corporate society will benefi t from the new guidance. "My initial opinion is that only large, well-followed compa- nies will be able to conclude that publishing information on their web site would satisfy the rules," Anderson says. "The key is the extent of dissemination to the marketplace, and it is only certain very big companies that reporters and analysts track regularly." Anderson is not convinced that investors commonly check company web sites. "The Internet's search capabili- ties means people don't have to go to primary sources for informa- tion," he says. "Companies are going to have to show that their site is a source of information for investors on a regular basis." It remains to be seen, then, whether some companies will be able to demonstrate the ubiquity of their sites by analyz- ing "hits" and the demograph- ics of the hits. Otherwise, their burden will be to let investors, analysts, and media know that the information is on the site by means of prominent dis- plays on the homepage or the use of push technologies such as RSS feeds that alert people when information is posted. "Companies who follow set procedures to ensure dissemina- tion will be better positioned, but I still believe that they have to be pretty good-sized companies for these types of procedures to take hold," Anderson says. Jeff Coopersmith, a partner in DLA Piper's Seattle offi ce, agrees that "smaller, less well- established" issuers might have diffi culty using their web sites to satisfy Regulation FD. "At the same time, I don't think the guidance is aimed just February Specials Visit our Web site and save 20% Mediating Estate Disputes Susan A. Easterbrook and Francine A. Herlehy Preparation of Wills and Powers of Attorney: First Interview to Final Report, Third Edition Mary L. MacGregor Guide to Powers of Attorney M. Jasmine Sweatman Ontario Estates and Trusts Legislation, 2008-2009 edition Consulting Editor: Ed Esposto (on Standing Order only) at the really big companies," he says. "Even companies that are not followed as well as the house- hold names can qualify by doing a really great job of keeping their web sites up to date." Indeed, Coopersmith goes so far as to opine that an SEC desire to incorporate or institutionalize web sites as hubs of the securities information dissemination sys- tem has at least partially driven the updated guidance. "I believe that part of the thinking behind the guidance is to ensure that companies manage their sites better than they have in the past," he says. "Any company properly advised needs to take a good, hard look at its web site in the context of the release." Diffi culties, for example, can arise because the relevant portions of company's web sites sometimes come under the purview of the in- vestor relations department. "The point is that either in- house or external securities law- yer should monitor the site from time to time to ensure that the company is comfortable with the statements published there, and that old stuff — like refer- ences to a line of business or a strategy that the company is no longer pursuing — is deleted," Richman says. What is certain is that it will take time for best practices to evolve and for companies to get comfortable with satisfying Regulation FD by resort to their web sites. And just when they do, it's likely that things will change again. Although the release be- came effective in August, the SEC was seeking comments on it through early November. "The comments will impact on future guidance, which I believe will come much, much sooner than the eight-year wait we had this time," Richman says. LT PAGE 9 www.lawtimesnews.com

• Cover
• Raise Internet Profile
• The Hill
• Focus On International/Cross-Border Law