Law Times

January 16, 2012

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 2 of 15

Law Times • January 16, 2012 NEWS PAGE 3 BY KENDYL SEBESTA Law Times B ereskin & Parr LLP is growing with its an- nouncement today that Donald MacOdrum of McMillan LLP will be merg- ing his practice with the firm, a move that follows a similar ac- tion by lawyers at intellectual property boutique Cameron MacKendrick LLP. "In one respect, I regret leav- ing Lang Michener and later McMillan because I have so many friends there and it's such a great group of people," says MacOdrum, a former partner at McMillan. "But on the other hand, I'm looking forward to the challenge and I am very excited." MacOdrum says he made the decision to merge his practice with Bereskin & Parr following Lang Michener's merger with McMillan last year. The deal meant MacOdrum was older than McMillan's age-based retire- ment policy allowed. "I wasn't quite ready to stop yet. I think this is going to be very ex- citing. I have a very high regard for them and I think it'll be fun for the four of us to build an even better team," he says, referencing the law- yers from Cameron MacKendrick who have also joined Bereskin & Parr. Partners Donald Cameron and Scott MacKendrick merged their practices with the firm earli- er this month along with colleague Christina Settimi. MacOdrum will join the pair on the firm's litigation team in Toronto. "We've been able to bring to Bereskin & Parr two of the most experienced IP liti- gators in Canada," says Philip Mendes da Costa, chairman of the firm's executive committee. "With the addition of partner Don MacOdrum, it will give us one of the largest depths of intel- lectual property experience in Canada. We're very happy, and I know Don, Scott, and now Don MacOdrum are as well." Mendes da Costa calls the move a "natural fit." "When this started out, we wanted to increase the strength and depth of our litigation group, and I happened to be at a function where MacKendrick said they were looking to bring their practice into a larger firm, so really it was just a natural fit." Mendes da Costa adds he hopes the move will attract high-profile intellectual proper- ty cases to the firm, a sentiment Cameron echoes. "We were looking for a big- ger firm and felt we were miss- ing out on some of the bigger files because we were so small at the time," says Cameron. "Some- times, perception becomes real- ity, and so we began looking for a bigger platform and more op- portunities for litigation." For his part, MacKendrick says the complementary na- ture of the firms has made for a smooth transition. "We saw Untitled-2 1 12-01-06 12:49 PM Protection for your clients that's smart for your practice. 1-855-636-3777 there was very much a comple- mentary fit between us, both from a client basis and a skill-set basis," he says. "It was thought that if we came together, we would form quite a formidable IP litigation team." Bereskin & Parr isn't the only firm making changes this month. In a formal merger, Ma- cleod Dixon LLP joined with Norton Rose OR LLP to create Norton Rose Canada. The move followed Ogilvy Renault LLP's high-profile move to join the global Norton Rose Group. "The merger was very client- driven in the sense that we want- ed to grow opportunities for our clients both in Canada and inter- nationally as well," says Bill Tuer, Macleod Dixon's managing part- ner in Calgary who now becomes an integration partner at Norton Rose Canada. "Norton Rose Canada allows us to do that." Traditionally, Ogilvys hadn't made such bold moves. It took a long time to open a practice in "From a practice perspective, the six key factors will still be pursued, but as we bring our- selves together under this un- folding process of change, we'll be building a new type of Cana- dian firm," says Coleman. In the meantime, Norton Rose From left to right, Don MacOdrum, Robert MacFarlane, and Donald Cameron are part of Bereskin & Parr LLP's expanded litigation team. Toronto and had only recently started up an office in Calgary. But the Norton Rose Group ap- pears to have a knack for spot- ting opportunities, says John Coleman, managing partner of Norton Rose Canada. "It was an evolution of simi- lar goals in the sense that Nor- ton Rose's six key sectors . . . including mining and energy . . . are sectors that Macleod is extremely powerful in, both on the oil-and-gas side and the mining side. It's almost like a marriage made in heaven." Coleman will head Norton Rose Canada with the support of a global executive committee. For now, committee members include Coleman, Tuer, and Norton Rose senior partner Michael Lang. could be setting its sights south of the border. "There's no doubt that to be a truly global firm, we'll have to look at all our options, in- cluding the U.S.," says Coleman. "I anticipate that could happen in the next two to three years." If so, the merger this month may signal a broader shiſt, says legal historian Christopher Moore. "Of course, given the merger with Norton Rose and the fact that most of the key Canadian corporate decisions could be heading elsewhere, Ogilvy and Norton Rose may signify a larger shiſt," he says. "But it remains to be seen whether there'll be more com- plex mergers in the future be- cause of it." LT ERAssure is the exclusive Preferred Supplier of executor E&O insurance for Canadian Bar Association members. Executor insurance. Q Your executor client becomes the subject of legal action for estate administration errors. Are you at risk? A If they aren't insured, the answer is a resounding yes. An uninsured claim for damages against an executor often results in an action against the estate solicitor alleging negligence. Making a claim on your professional E&O insurance could mean distraction, out-of-pocket deductibles and higher premiums for you. Recommend ERAssure® ERAssure® for your clients. Protecting them makes sense for you. is a registered trademark of Estate Risk Protection Plan Inc. IP heavyweights join Bereskin & Parr

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - January 16, 2012