Law Times

April 25, 2016

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/670066

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 19

Law Times • apriL 25, 2016 Page 3 www.lawtimesnews.com NEWS Allegations relate to relationship with suspended lawyer Windsor lawyer allowed to continue practising BY PETER SMALL For Law Times A disciplinary panel has ruled against tempo- rarily suspending a Windsor litigator over allegations that her romantic relationship with a suspended lawyer resulted in her helping him to illicitly practice law. "Hearing from the respon- dent reduces our concerns about the effect of the resumption of her relationship," writes Law Society of Upper Canada pan- elist Susan Richer, backed by Suzanne Clement, in an April 8 decision. The panel rejected a motion by Law Society prosecutors to replace existing interlocutory restrictions on Maria Marusic's licence with a full interlocutory suspension. Her licence was restricted by another panel last year pending an investigation into the alleged misappropriation of trust funds held by her former law firm, the now-dissolved Shulgan Martini Marusic LLP. The recent panel imposed one further control on Marusic's licence: She is barred from al- lowing Claudio Martini, her ro- mantic partner and former law partner, into her office. In a dissent, panel chair So- phie Martel would have imposed a full interlocutory suspension. Martel notes that the 49-year- old lawyer has renewed her per- sonal relationship with Martini, 52, despite previously professing to be shocked by his deceit. The resumed romance and the relo- cation of her Windsor practice, Marusic Law, to the building where Martini works heighten the risk of harm to the public, Martel writes. A Law Society spokesperson said it is reviewing the decision and has no comment. Brian Greenspan, Marusic's lawyer, told Law Times that Marusic has been an able and highly regarded litigator for 20 years. Greenspan said it is stereo- typical for the Law Society to question the resumption of Marusic's personal relationship with Martini because there is no evidence he had a controlling in- f luence on her professional life. Until there is, Greenspan said, "I don't think it's any of the Law Society's business what people do in their personal lives and whether or not they choose to reconcile with people with whom they were previously es- tranged." The ruling is the latest in a complex web of allegations re- garding Martini's practice going back to the mid-2000s. Martini was once a promi- nent Windsor lawyer and Maru- sic's law partner in their now- defunct firm. They were in a romantic re- lationship between 2001 and March 2015, and once took steps to jointly buy a house. The ro- mance resumed in August 2015. In October 2014, Martini was found guilty of professional misconduct for deceiving two clients about their legal proceed- ings. He was suspended three months later. A Law Society investigation into the firm began in Decem- ber 2014 when Martini admitted to using $50,000 of trust funds held for one company to pay another client in a fake settle- ment. Money was withdrawn 12 times from trust funds held for the company, contrary to unful- filled trust conditions. Marusic admitted to co- signing three trust cheques with Martini, through which the law firm paid itself fees totalling $1.26 million. At first enlisting the advice of lawyer Marie Henein, Maru- sic told the earlier disciplinary panel that she was the victim of Martini's deceitful ways and was "shocked and appalled" to learn she had been asked to co-sign cheques when, unknown to her, the trust conditions were unful- filled. She said their romantic relationship was over. Martini has stated in an e- mail to the Law Society that he is solely responsible for the inap- propriate transfers of those trust funds, of which Marusic had no knowledge. Last year's panel found significant questions had been raised about Marusic's in- tegrity regarding the trust funds. The panel imposed restrictions on her use of trust and general bank accounts. The current proceedings arise with regards to "Client X," a self-described "very success- ful lawyer" and "vulture," whom Martini represented since 2010 in litigation dating back to 1984. After Martini was suspend- ed, Marusic took carriage of the file, which they discussed on several occasions. A multi-week trial was sched- uled to start in May 2015 in Ottawa, but a settlement was reached in July. Martini met with Client X and Marusic at an Ottawa con- dominium building where both she and Client X rented units. At a meeting in Client X's unit, Martini hand-wrote an authorization to settle the law- suit, including the fees Marusic's law firm would receive. The fees amounted to 54 per cent of the settlement. Client X subsequently hired new lawyers and is disputing the fees. Law Society prosecutors sub- mitted the Client X case provides compelling evidence Marusic has been facilitating the practice of law by Martini, in contraven- tion of Law Society regulations. Marusic, however, testi- fied she consulted Law Society guidelines before enlisting Mar- tini's help in the transfer of the complex file of more than 4,000 documents. She said Martini's presence during pre-trial preparatory meetings was necessary to prop- erly serve Client X. Through her new lawyers, Greenspan and Naomi Lutes, Marusic asserted that the issue is merely the extension of an ongo- ing fee dispute with Client X. They contended it is not the Law Society's role to be involved in a fee dispute. Greenspan said his team explained to the panel that it was necessary for Martini to be involved in the transferring of the file. LT REGISTER ONLINE www.lexpert.ca/cpdcentre For more information, please contact Lexpert® at 1-877-298-5868 or e-mail: lexpert.questions@thomsonreuters.com EXECUTIVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FULLY ACCREDITED IN-CLASS PROGRAMS & LIVE WEBINARS Avoiding & Managing Securities Litigation Risk Swimming with Sharks in The Securities Market Paul Mingay & David Di Paolo Partners of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Toronto & Webinar June 1 6th Annual Social Media Law Navigate the Legal Landmines of Social Media Susan Vogt, Daniel Cole & Eric Macramalla Partners of Gowling WLG Toronto & Webinar June 7 Corporate Transactions The People Element of Corporate Transactions Michael Ford, QC Partner, DLA Piper (Canada) LLP Toronto & Webinar June 8 4th Annual Canadian Construction Insurance Law Keeping Pace in the Evolving World of Construction Bruce Reynolds & Sharon Vogel Partners of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Toronto & Webinar June 2 NWT Safety Regulations The Legal Road to Workplace Safety Glenn Tait Partner, McLennan Ross LLP Yellowknife & Webinar June 9 Duties of Good Faith Are your Contractual Relationships Balanced with Honesty? Eli Lederman Partner, Lenczner Slaght Toronto & Webinar June 9 The Rise Of Finance Technology in Canada FinTech, A Radical New Paradigm in Canadian Finance Nicolas Faucher & Kareen Zimmer Partners of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Toronto & Webinar June 9 Untitled-7 1 2016-04-21 4:18 PM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - April 25, 2016