Law Times

Page 8 September 3, 2018 • Law timeS www.lawtimesnews.com New construction adjudication process coming BY MEAGAN GILLMORE For Law Times L awyers say the forthcom- ing adjudication process for Ontario's construc- tion industry has the po- tential to resolve payments in a timely fashion, but companies need to start preparing now for the changes. The Ontario government passed sweeping changes to the province's construction law last December. This includes rules to enforce prompt payment and the creation of an adjudication process to settle payment dis- putes. Both of these measures come into effect on Oct. 1, 2019. "It's a natural evolution as construction gets more com- plex," says Howard Wise, a part- ner at Goodmans LLP in Toron- to who focuses on commercial litigation and construction law. "It gives an opportunity to address issues sooner rather than later, which is ultimately a good thing for parties." Neil Abbott, a partner with Gowling WLG in Toronto who practises construction law, says prompt payment helps compa- nies co-operate and lowers ten- sions on a job site. "Prompt payment is designed to keep the project going," he says. "[The government] brought in adjudication to resolve those payment disputes on an invoice- by-invoice basis." The Construction Act says owners will have to pay general contractors within 28 days after receiving an invoice. After gen- eral contractors are paid, they have seven days to pay subcon- tractors. Those subcontractors need to pay their subcontractors seven days after they've been paid, the law says. Disputes about payment can be sent to adjudication if there isn't already a contract dispute resolution process written in the contract, the law says. The par- ties can pick their adjudicator from a list of qualified adjudica- tors, and if they can't agree on the adjudicator, one can be cho- sen for them, says the act. "[Prompt payment rules] only work if you also have a ham- mer in the anvil," says Abbott. "You've got a backstop. " The law says adjudication decisions must be made within 30 days and be in writing. These decisions are binding on an in- terim basis, the law says. Litigation can sometimes happen a decade after a project is complete, says Abbott. Ad- judication "at least eliminates some of the misery associated with that," he says. Parties may decide to not take a case to court after adjudica- tion, says Harvey Kirsh of Kirsh Construction ADR Services Ltd. in Toronto, who has practised construction law for more than 40 years. "Often, the parties seem to find that interim adjudication will often be the ones that the parties at the end of the day ac- cept," he says. "They don't neces- sarily proceed to another round of dispute resolution, either by court proceedings or arbitra- tion." Parties may also choose not to go to court when the project is complete because a dispute may not seem as important then, he says. The adjudication process can also be a chance to show the benefits of alternative dispute resolution, says Marvin Huber- man, president of the Alterna- tive Dispute Resolution Institute of Ontario. "The table is set for a poten- tially terrific opportunity to re- ally achieve the goals of the new Construction Act and simul- taneously many of the goals of alternative dispute resolution," he says. "This type of initiative can facilitate achieving the goals of ADR — alternative dispute resolution or appropriate dis- pute resolution — which is to reduce court caseloads and re- ally provide speedy resolutions of disputes [that] are disruptive to communities and businesses." The government will choose an Authorized Nominating Au- thority to select and train quali- fied adjudicators and administer a code of conduct. The Autho- rized Nominating Authority has not been selected yet, and more information about the selection process will be available in the coming months, a spokesperson for the Ministry of the Attorney General wrote in an email to Law Times. The email further says that a registry of qualified adjudicators will likely be posted online after. Regulations under the Con- struction Act say adjudicators must have at least 10 years of experience in the construction industry, for example, as an ac- countant, architect, engineer, quality surveyor, project man- ager, lawyer or arbitrator. Ontario is the first Canadian jurisdiction to introduce an ad- judication process for construc- tion, says Huberman, but other jurisdictions are looking at it. In the United Kingdom, where there has been adjudication in construction disputes for years, Huberman says, "there seems to be interest on focusing attention on dispute prevention." Meanwhile, lawyers say busi- nesses need to change how they do things to prepare for this new process. "I think like everything it will have growing pains. People won't necessarily be used to it," says Wise, noting there's still more than a year before the regulations about adjudication come into force. Companies may need to hire staff whose job it is to respond to adjudications, he says. They'll also need to make sure their documents are organized, he says. The law says the party that requests the adjudication has five days to give relevant docu- ments to the adjudicator once the adjudicator has been chosen. "There's going to be a new regime, and if you have to make sure you have the resources in- ternally to deal with responding to a request to adjudicate be- cause it is done in almost a real- time situation," says Wise. LT Howard Wise says a new adjudication process over payment disputes 'gives an opportunity to address issues sooner rather than later.' FOCUS FOCUS ON Alternative Dispute Resolution What's your biggest management challenge? Growth? Recruiting? Legal costs? Weigh in on these issues and more in our annual corporate counsel survey. Survey is open August 8 – September 10 canadianlawyermag.com/surveys ATTENTION IN-HOUSE COUNSEL! T H E A N N U A L Presented by CORPORATE COUNSEL S U R V E Y Untitled-3 1 2018-08-02 3:27 PM

• Cover