Law Times

December 10, 2018

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/1059806

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 23

Law Times • December 10, 2018 Page 3 www.lawtimesnews.com Good method for addressing condo disputes ADR can help with cannabis law BY MEAGAN GILLMORE For Law Times A lternative dispute resolution methods could help resolve dis- putes arising from the legalization of recreational can- nabis in Canada, say lawyers. "This whole change in the law is really a game changer for all kinds of expectations and ways that society is going to look at and treat people and corpora- tions and the government," says Marvin Huberman, a Toronto mediator and lawyer. For example, Huberman, along with Jonathan Jacobs, a law- yer and alternative dispute resolu- tion specialist in Toronto, recently founded the Canadian Cannabis Dispute Resolution Centre. The centre aims to be a "cen- tral hub for dispute resolution in the cannabis space within Cana- da," says Huberman. He and Ja- cobs evaluate clients' problems, suggest solutions, arrange and participate in resolution meth- ods, including arbitrations or mediations, or refer clients to alternative dispute resolution professionals who are also part of the network. Since launching in Septem- ber, they've mainly dealt with disputes relating to commercial property, including those at con- dominiums, says Huberman. He says the centre is focused on civil disputes, and he expects to be asked to help resolve con- f licts in a wide range of areas, including securities regulations, zoning, concerns related to inter- national travel and employment. "This whole change in the law does really impact people's lives in all types of things: in their pri- vate lives, in their public lives," he says. Alternative dispute resolu- tion may be especially impor- tant for disputes arising at con- dominiums where residents may complain about cannabis smoke or smells, says Lou Na- tale, a partner in the commer- cial real estate group at Dale & Lessmann LLP in Toronto, who practises ADR on behalf of con- dominium corporations. Natale has been working in condominium law for more than 20 years, but he says he's noticed an increase in recent years of cli- ents contacting him about com- plaints related to tobacco smell. "What I'm finding now is condos are taking advantage of this cannabis rule to also imple- ment tobacco rules," he says. Some corporations who wanted to create rules prohibiting rec- reational cannabis use in the buildings did not have similar rules prohibiting the use of to- bacco, says Natale. Residents often complain about smells coming from other units, he says, and when there isn't a specific rule banning a substance in a building, he rec- ommends corporations treat the concern like a nuisance com- plaint. Often, residents can mini- mize offensive smells by install- ing air purifiers or turning fans on, he says. "We tend to find the informal way is the best way to handle it, but if we have to go beyond that, then we have to go to the next level," Natale says, which is where ADR can become useful. "We encourage a lot of inter- action before it gets to that legal, formal step of ADR," he says. Many corporations were rush- ing to create policies about the use of recreational cannabis use in their buildings before posses- sion and growing of recreational cannabis became legal on Oct. 17, says Michael Campbell, se- nior associate at Deacon Spears Fedson + Montizambert solici- tors in Toronto. Any disagreements related to these policies need to be sent to mediation, and if necessary, ar- bitration. The Condominium Act re- quires "the corporation and the owners to agree to submit a dis- agreement between the parties with respect to the declaration, by-laws or rules to mediation and arbitration." "If the dispute is under any of the governing documents, then it's mandatory to submit it to alternative dispute resolution," says Campbell. "There's not re- ally a choice." But these decisions are confidential, so they can't be used to help settle disputes later in similar situations. "The corporation has an ob- ligation to keep confidential re- cords that relate to one particular unit or another," says Campbell. "If you have a decision in re- lation to one particular unit, you can't necessarily take that decision and apply it like you could with a court decision in the context of a dispute with a different unit — even within the same complex. There's going to be inconsistencies, inevitably from complex to complex and potentially between unit to unit by virtue of the confidentiality of arbitration decisions." The confidential aspect of alternative dispute resolution could be useful in other con- texts, such as employment, says Darryl Hiscocks, counsel at To- rys LLP in Toronto, who advises companies in areas related to human resources, employment and labour law. Hiscocks says he hasn't been contacted by many employers with concerns since recreational cannabis became legal in Oc- tober, but he envisions it could cause conf licts if employees are disciplined for being impaired by recreational cannabis at work or if their employer assumes they are. "The sky's the limit really in terms of potential disputes that could emerge around the use of cannabis in the workplace," he says. Keeping disputes confiden- tial through alternative resolu- tion methods could benefit both employers and employees, His- cocks says. "Although increasingly it seems in Canada that the stigma associated with using cannabis is slowly diminishing, neverthe- less, I think it's fair to say that the stigma still exists, which would lend itself to a more private form of resolution in many different contexts and circumstances as opposed to court," he says. Employers may not want a workplace dispute about canna- bis use to be public knowledge, especially if they work in areas such as health care or financial services or "anywhere employ- ers might be concerned that this could become laundry to be aired in public," Hiscocks says. Public disclosure could also damage an employee's future job prospects. Jacobs says he expects to see the Canadian Cannabis Dispute Resolution Centre receive more inquiries related to municipal zoning and bylaws in the com- ing weeks as Ontario's munici- pal governments, elected shortly after legalization, determine what they will allow within their jurisdictions. "I think the most interesting areas are yet to be determined because of the recent municipal elections that have happened," he says. Jacobs says that, at the Cana- dian Cannabis Dispute Resolu- tion Centre, alternative dispute resolution can include facilitating discussions between disagreeing parties, as well as the more tra- ditional methods of negotiation, arbitration and mediation. He and Huberman have both taken the time to consider how the "dense" laws about legalized recreational cannabis impact various areas of life — knowledge mediators often don't have time to acquire before a process begins. While the centre is based in Ontario, the scope of the work is national, says Huberman. They have already spoken with indi- viduals in British Columbia and several Atlantic provinces about joining their roster of profes- sionals, he says. Huberman says this new cen- tre is not formally affiliated with the ADR Institute of Ontario, of which he is the current president. "The disputes that are going to arise in this space are numer- ous. Some of them are complex and others are fairly straightfor- ward," Huberman says, noting the importance of considering how regulations about cannabis vary between provinces and ter- ritories and municipalities. LT NEWS Marvin Huberman says he recently found- ed a centre that will be a 'central hub for dispute resolution in the cannabis space within Canada.' The sky's the limit really in terms of potential disputes that could emerge around the use of cannabis in the workplace. Darryl Hiscocks EDITOR'S NOTE Law Times ran a cartoon in its Nov. 26 edition that featured members of the personal injury bar. Readers complained that the cartoon was offensive, and so it has been removed from our website and digital edition. Law Times apologizes for any offence that was caused. Register now and save! oba.org/19institute Canada's largest CPD event returns, bringing the OHJDOFRPPXQLW\WRJHWKHUIRUȴYHGD\VRI&3' programs that will maximize your time and budget. Join your colleagues at this networking powerhouse, and discover fresh approaches to the unique challenges you face every day. Register before December 15, 2018 and SAVE 15% Use Coupon Code SAVE15BY15 FEBRUARY 5-9, 2019 Untitled-2 1 2018-12-04 2:55 PM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - December 10, 2018