Law Times

Photo: Robin Kuniski Law Times • October 28, 2013 Page 3 NEWS LAO staff lawyers' union bid rejected BY YAMRI TADDESE Law Times I n what legal aid staff lawyers are calling a "classic union busting," Legal Aid Ontario's chief executive officer has rejected their bid to secure collective-bargaining rights. After six months of waiting, legal aid staff lawyers who are fighting to join a union heard back from LAO head Bob Ward about their request and they don't like what they're hearing. As a group of protesters held a rally on Oct. 18 outside LAO's office where a board of directors meeting was ongoing, Ward sent a letter to the lawyers rejecting their bid for voluntary recognition, says Bill Fitzpatrick, a spokesman for the group. Under labour laws, lawyers must get voluntary recognition from their employers in order to join a union. The Labour Relations Act excludes lawyers, but others in that position, such as police and government lawyers, have received voluntary recognition from their employers, according to the legal aid lawyers. "In order for lawyers to have representation to enter into a collective-bargaining agreement with their employer, their employer needs to voluntarily recognize them," says Fitzpatrick. Yet lawyers, such as those working with the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association and the Association of Law Officers of the Crown, have secured such rights, legal aid lawyers say. Indignant about their situation, legal aid lawyers had requested that the Society of Energy Professionals serve as their exclusive bargaining agent. But after "thoughtfully and carefully" considering the request, Ward sent a response to union president Scott Travers saying he had decided to reject it. "LAO does not have any legal obligation to voluntarily recognize a trade union to represent employees to whom the [Ontario Labour Relations Act] does not apply, nor to enter into a bargaining relationship with a trade union entirely outside the established process and structure of the OLRA," he wrote in a response to the lawyers. Ward also disputed the lawyers' claim that what they're asking for is no different from what Crown attorneys have. "What the Society of Energy Professionals is seeking is, in fact, entirely different from the relationship that exists between the Crown in Right of Ontario and its lawyers," wrote Ward. "No group of lawyers in Canada, to the best of our knowledge, is, or ever has been, represented by a trade union such as the Society of Energy Professionals in their employment relationship," he added, a statement Scott says is "historically and legally" incorrect. Ward also said the relationship between the Crown and its lawyers is a "direct" one and that to bargain with you and set a "these relationships have committee' would be illegal," evolved over time and he continues. "It's not really have been fashioned by for the employer to decide those associations of lawwho its employees choose to yers and their employer be represented by." in accordance with their Besides what Barrett calls respective interests." "classic union busting," the Steven Barrett, counsel lawyers also allege there's "an for the LAO staff lawyers, element of discrimination" says Ward's response "is in LAO's refusal to grant not rooted in reality or voluntary recognition. Twocommon sense." thirds of LAO staff lawyers There's no difference beare women and the group tween their desired union includes other "vulnerable" and the associations that lawyers from diverse racial represent other government lawyers, according to Bar- 'I think the real motive is made clear by Bob backgrounds, they say. "On the one hand, the rett. "It's frankly not a reason Ward's statement that he wants to deal and that would make any sense bargain directly with individual lawyers,' more traditional associafor anyone who has any un- says Steven Barrett. Photo: Robin Kuniski tions are recognized to have collective bargaining rights, derstanding of labour relations. I think the real motive is made clear by yet [to] the group of lawyers who are most vulBob Ward's statement that he wants to deal and nerable, Bob Ward is saying no," says Barrett. "That's blatantly discriminatory." bargain directly with individual lawyers." Just over 100 people attended the recent Eighty per cent of legal aid lawyers chose to join the Society of Energy Professionals, rally, according to Fitzpatrick. Some of those in attendance were members of the Ontario Barrett notes. "For the employer to say, 'No, we don't want Nurses' Association, the latest group to throw to bargain with your choice and we're just going its support behind the lawyers. "Nurses know what it's like to be told, 'no,' you don't deserve the same democratic right to collectively bargain your working conditions as similar groups of employees that are male-dominated," said ONA president Linda HaslamStroud in a press release. "When we began organizing 40 years ago, the government, at first, refused to recognize nurses as union members," she added. In a letter written in response to Ward, Scott said he was "disappointed" with the CEO's conclusion. "To be frank, after almost six months, your letter struck me as a cavalier and arbitrary dismissal of the democratically expressed wishes of LAO lawyers," he wrote. "Your 'explanation' is also historically and legally inaccurate," Scott continued, citing that among other lawyer groups, CUPE Local 1949 represents legal aid lawyers in Saskatchewan. "Your uncertainty regarding the extent to associate is astounding," he wrote. "If any uncertainly exists, LAO should err on the side of an interpretation that promotes and recognizes Charter rights and freedoms, rather than one which abrogates them." Attorney General John Gerretsen has already acknowledged legal aid lawyers' right to secure a collective agreement. The Criminal Lawyers' Association also supports the idea.LT LEXPERT® LEGAL EDUCATION SEMINARS FALL 2013 SCHEDULE WEBCAST OPTION AVAILABLE FOR COURSES! THE 5th ANNUAL PROCUREMENT & FINANCING OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FORUM December 2, 2013, Toronto, Ontario THE 6th ANNUAL ADVERTISING AND MARKETING LAW FORUM December 10, 2013, Toronto, Ontario ABORIGINAL LAW: CONSULTATION AND OTHER EMERGING ISSUES October 28, 2013, Calgary, Alberta November 5, 2013, Toronto, Ontario CLOUD COMPUTING: A PRACTICAL APPROACH November 26, 2013, Calgary, Alberta November 28, 2013, Toronto, Ontario December 10, 2013, Toronto, Ontario CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 2013: MEETING SHAREHOLDER EXPECTATIONS December 3, 2013, Toronto, Ontario December 5, 2013, Calgary, Alberta DEALING WITH THE LEASE: LEGAL PRINCIPLES & LITIGATION PERILS! November 21, 2013, Toronto, Ontario ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION COMPLIANCE: COPING WITH THE ONSLAUGHT December 9, 2013, Calgary, Alberta December 12, 2013, Toronto, Ontario CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: WHEN IGNORANCE ISN'T BLISS DOING BUSINESS IN CANADA'S OIL & GAS AND LNG SECTORS* December 10, Houston, Texas EMERGING TRENDS AND BEST PRACTICES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOURCING November 28, 2013, Toronto, Ontario December 10, 2013, Calgary, Alberta INFORMATION PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION: TECHNOLOGY, SECURITY AND CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY IN TODAY'S MARKETPLACE November 14, 2013, Montréal, Québec December 9, 2013, Toronto, Ontario THE LIFE CYCLE OF PHARMACEUTICALS: ADDING VALUE AT EACH STAGE December 2, 2013, Toronto, Ontario December 5, 2013, Montréal, Québec NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW IN CANADA: SUCCEEDING IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD* December 3, 2013, Los Angeles, California PATENTS: PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING YOUR TECHNOLOGY November 12, 2013, Toronto, Ontario November 18, 2013, Calgary, Alberta For more information or to register for these seminars, please visit www.lexpert.ca/events *webcast option not available Lexpert_LT_Sep23_13.indd 1 www.lawtimesnews.com 13-09-17 6:30 PM

• Cover