Law Times

March 31, 2008

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/268978

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 15

www.lawtimesnews.com Law TiMes / March 31, 2008 Page 5 Prosecutors treating regulatory matters more harshly T he Ministry of Labour's decision to continue with its appeal of a sen- tence under the Occupational Health and Safety Act — even after the offender finished serv- ing his sentence — shows that the ministry is pressing hard for jail time in such regulatory mat- ters, says an employment and labour lawyer. Goldie Bassi, a lawyer with Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP who represented the respondent in the Superior Court case R. v. Pasquale Di Franco, says pros- ecutors are treating regulatory matters more harshly. "The fact that the ministry would appeal this decision — it's one thing for them to have asked for jail and not received it. But then to appeal a deci- sion I think says something. I think they're looking at these at a different level." Di Franco pleaded guilty to two offences under the OHSA in November 2005 after a pair of workers under his control as supervisor of a Toronto con- struction site fell from the 16th floor of an elevator shaft and died, according to a March 7 endorsement by Superior Court Justice Robert Clark. Di Franco was fined $30,000 and received one year of probation. Two corporations also were charged in the incident, receiv- ing fines of $280,000 and $300,000 respectively. Ministry of Labour law- yer David McCaskill argued at appeal that the trial judge should have imposed a custodial sentence. However, he conceded that delays in perfecting the appeal led to Di Franco having already served his sentence, and that it was unlikely the court would impose a jail term at that stage. But McCaskill felt the court set an important precedent in imposing a strong, deterrent sentence. Clark noted in his decision that fewer than 24 of the thou- sands of OHSA prosecutions have resulted in imprisonment for an individual. He also found that the trial judge had properly considered the need for general deterrence, the impact on the victims' families, and mitigat- ing factors, such as the fact that Di Franco had no record and showed remorse by quickly pleading guilty. Clark dismissed the appeal, writing, "This was not a case where imprisonment was the only fit outcome." The judge also expressed his reluctance to impose a custodial sentence at such a late date. Bassi says the Ministry of Labour's approach to the case demonstrates that it is becom- ing "very aggressive" in its prosecutions. "They say it's all about gen- eral deterrence; they really want to send the message out that they're serious about enforcing the OHSA," says Bassi. "With the last minister of Labour, there was a real push on really enforc- ing the OHSA strenuously." The ministry at that time hired over 200 inspectors and a number of lawyers to their legal- services branch, she adds. "They're just taking a much harder approach to this, and it is seriously. I think there's almost a fatality a day in Ontario from the workplace." While jail terms remain rare in regulatory matters, Bassi says some types of cases seem to attract such punishments. "We have noticed, though, in the last two years, that short periods of jail are being handed out," she says, adding those sentences have normal- ly been reserved for cases in which individuals have been charged with obstruction by hampering inspections. In the case of Di Franco, Bassi says the Superior Court rightly backed the trend against jail terms in regulatory matters. "This was a serious case, but he stepped up, he took respon- sibility, he was there for every court appearance," even though he's not mandated to do so, she says, adding the $30,000 fine imposed on Di Franco was "significant." "To impose jail on some- body now, three years after the incident . . . would have been entirely unfair. What judge Clark said was that there's lots of different ways of achieving deterrence, and in this case, jail wasn't the only way." McCaskill says the ministry felt the Di Franco case was a "particularly egregious" one. "Two workers were killed," he says. "We thought that Mr. Di Franco's personal responsibility was such that a somewhat more significant penalty than merely a monetary policy was called for." McCaskill compares these types of cases to drunk-driv- ing incidents, in which those responsible for a death face jail time. He notes that regulato- ry matters fall somewhere in between criminal and civil mat- ters in the justice system. "We're dealing particularly with a vulnerable class of peo- ple — workers on job sites. Often they're at the mercy of the employer, they're directed to do what they do by the supervisors . . . and if those supervisors act- ing as the proxy of the company don't do the job with an eye, first and foremost, on worker safety, then there has to be a strong message sent out that we will protect workers." McCaskill says general deter- rence is the best way to protect workers under the OHSA. "What we want to do is make sure that employers . . . under- stand that they have, as the courts have defined it, a very strict and rigid duty for the protection of people working under their con- trol. If they fail to live up to the protections that the laws impose, they will be prosecuted and we will seek penalties that reflect the severity of the situation." But McCaskill says the min- istry has no policy in terms of seeking jail terms. "Every case is on its own merits," he says. "We approach a case just as criminal Crown attorneys would. We look at each case on its merits and determine what the appropri- ate sentence, in our considered, educated view, is." NEWS With over 20,000 Office Products finding what you want is easy. Office & Furniture Products • Corporate Promotional Products Printing & Graphic Services • Law Office Essentials Corporate Supplies • Search & Registration Services your ONE source supplier for W e ' r e a C a n a d i a n C o m p a n y dyedurhambasics.ca • 1-888-393-3874 • Fax: 1-800-263-2772 OFFICE & FURNITURE PRODUCTS SAVE ON Kraft Reversible File Folders 24079-08 Letter size Reg. $21.99 sale $9.99 24084-08 Legal size Reg. $28.99 sale $11.99 on Sale for the month of April 2008 only. (taxes, delivery not included) 54 % save UP T0 54 % save Kraft folders contain a minimum of 60% post-consumer recycled materials. 10-1/2pt. 100 per box. Also available in a carton of 5 boxes. DD LT RX3RDA-09 OP ad 3/25/08 12:55 PM Page 1 'The fact that the ministry would appeal this decision — it's one thing for them to have asked for jail and not received it. But then to appeal a decision I think says something,' says Goldie Bassi. BY ROBERT TODD Law Times it's weekly e-news! it's fresh. it's free. F r o M T h e e d I T o r s o F C a n a d I a n L a w y e r a n d L a w T I M e s s i g n u p t o d a y a t w w w. c a n a d i a n l a w y e r m a g . c o m C A N A D I A N L E G A L N E W S W I R E LT

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - March 31, 2008