The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario
Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/380134
Law Times • sepTember 15, 2014 Page 9 www.lawtimesnews.com Strategic mergers back in the spotlight Tim Hortons deal latest sign of renewed activity for competition bar By Julius Melnitzer For Law Times ompetition lawyers are not surprisingly wel- coming the return of the strategic merger, as evidenced by such combinations as the $12.4-billion Loblaws and Shoppers Drug Mart deal, the $12-billion Burger King and Tim Hortons merger, the $5.8-billion arrangement between Sobeys and Safeway, and the host of tax-inver- sion transactions in the pharma- ceutical industry. "The return of the strategic merger has made competition practice a lot more interesting," says Dany Assaf of Torys LLP. "Companies were waiting for the right time, and it looks like the right time has come." In assessing the future of merger reviews, a key develop- ment is the approach of the cur- rent competition commissioner, John Pecman, who took the job in June 2013. "As part of the com- missioner's desire to increase transparency in merger review, the Competition Bureau has published position statements explaining the bureau's approach to complex mergers," says Chris Hersh of Cassels Brock & Black- well LLP's Toronto office. "These statements provide very careful insight into the bu- reau's analysis of the competitive dynamics of an industry." From a practical perspective, the Loblaws and Shoppers Drug Mart combination has been particularly instructive. "In ad- dition to having to divest stores and pharmacy operations, a novel feature of the deal was that the bureau required Loblaws to enter into certain arrangements with its suppliers on a go-for- ward basis," says Hersh. "This is the first time that rem- edies of this nature have been im- posed in a retail merger and it may signal that the bureau will be fo- cusing on the supply-side impact in certain industries." At the same time the bureau imposed those conditions, how- ever, it indicated it was investigat- ing Loblaws' "preferred supplier" arrangements under the Compe- tition Act's civil provisions. "The message is that informa- tion provided to the bureau in the context of merger review may prompt investigation of conduct under other provisions of the leg- islation," says Hersh. Also in the offing is the Su- preme Court of Canada's decision in Tervita Corp. v. Commissioner of Competition, a case argued in March 2014 and currently on reserve. The case considerably broadens the prospect of compe- tition risk in corporate and com- mercial transactions. Tervita originates with a Com- petition Tribunal decision in May 2012 that ordered CCS Corp. (now Tervita), the purchaser of a company that owned a proposed B.C. landfill site, to divest itself of the property on the grounds that the transaction would lead to a substantial prevention of compe- tition in the market for the dis- posal of hazardous waste in that province. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision. Because the merger price was only about $6 million, the trans- action was non-notifiable. But most merger reviews that make the news involve notifiable transactions where the parties involved have assets in Canada or Canadian sales exceeding some $400 million and the tar- get's Canadian assets or sales ex- ceed some $82 million. "In addition to being the first merger challenge brought since 2005, this case is indicative of the bureau's willingness to challenge mergers of any size, including those that do not exceed the no- tification threshold," says Anita Banicevic of Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP's Toronto office. But some lawyers argue Ter- vita will have a chilling effect on smaller combinations. "To the extent that the bureau becomes more aggressive regard- ing smaller transactions, the po- tential costs of a merger review become more relevant to the transaction," says Micah Wood of Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP's Toronto office. The upshot is that Tervita invites new considerations for smaller businesses as well as larger ones. "Although Tervita is a bit of a unique case, it serves as a useful reminder to parties that are con- sidering non-notifiable mergers that they are still subject to the commissioner's jurisdiction," says Subrata Bhattacharjee of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP's Toronto office. According to Bhattacharjee, parties to non-notifiable mergers frequently fail to pay timely atten- tion to antitrust issues. "What Tervita tells us is that parties to any merger should sit down in the early stages and consider whether the proposed transaction will have any market impact," he says. LT FOCUS LEXPERT LEGAL EDUCATION SEMINARS FALL 2014 SCHEDULE NEW PROCUREMENT: CRITICAL DEVELOPMENTS FROM PROCESS TO PRACTICE Toronto • October 21, 2014 REVOLUTIONARY PAYMENT SOLUTIONS 2014 & BEYOND: LEGAL & REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PRIMER Toronto • October 29, 2014 THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO DEFENSE & SECURITY PROCUREMENT 2014 & BEYOND: NAVIGATING CANADA'S FAST CHANGING LANDSCAPE Toronto • November 6, 2014 6TH ANNUAL ABORIGINAL LAW: CONSULTATION AND OTHER EMERGING ISSUES Calgary • December 2, 2014 Toronto • December 9, 2014 7TH ANNUAL ADVERTISING LAW: BEYOND THE CASL WALLS Toronto • December 2, 2014 CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: WHEN IGNORANCE ISN'T BLISS Toronto • December 3, 2014 ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION COMPLIANCE: COPING WITH THE ONSLAUGHT Calgary • December 8, 2014 Toronto • December 11, 2014 INFORMATION PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION Toronto • November 27, 2014 Vancouver • December 2, 2014 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 2014: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN SPECIAL SITUATIONS Toronto • December 4, 2014 Calgary • December 8, 2014 MANAGING RISK IN THE MINING SECTOR – PRACTICAL STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL OUTCOMES Toronto • November 20, 2014 THE LIFE CYCLE OF PHARMACEUTICALS – ADDING VALUE AT EACH STAGE Toronto • November 4, 2014 DEALING WITH THE LEASE: STATE OF THE UNION! TODAY'S TOP TEN LEASE ISSUES PLUS THE FRANCHISE TRIANGLE Toronto • November 26, 2014 REGISTER ONLINE www.lexpert.ca/cpdcentre WEBCAST OPTION AVAILABLE! For more information or to register, please contact Lexpert® Events at 1-877-298-5868 or e-mail: register@lexpert.ca LEXC1238_Lexpert course ad for fall_7.875x6.5.indd 1 14-07-29 11:20 AM New in this edition • All amendments to the Small Claims Rules and Forms including the latest amendments in force January 1, 2014 (O. Reg. 230/13) and July 1, 2014 (O, Reg. 44/14) • All significant new court decisions, both reported and unreported, throughout Canada • Substantial and lengthy commentary has been added, including such areas of interest as: motions, fee waivers, court interpreter fees, costs, court recordings • Self-help Overview • Revised and Updated Survey of Recent Developments in the Small Claims Court • All the latest Practice Directions and Protocols New Edition Ontario Small Claims Court Practice 2015 Mr. Justice Marvin A. Zuker and J. Sebastian Winny Get the latest on small claims court practice Available risk-free for 30 days Order online: www.carswell.com Call Toll-Free: 1-800-387-5164 In Toronto: 416-609-3800 Order # 986176-65203 $103 Hardcover + CD-ROM August 2014 approx. 1300 pages 978-0-7798-6176-7 Annual volumes supplied on standing order subscription Practice Advisor available upon request on standing order subscription Multiple copy discounts available Shipping and handling are extra. Price(s) subject to change without notice and subject to applicable taxes. For almost 35 years, Ontario Small Claims Court Practice has offered comprehensive coverage of every aspect of commencing or defending a claim to appeals and enforcement of a judgment. The new edition is updated to include all the latest cases and the most recent amendments to the Small Claims Court rules and forms. 00223DV-A46157 C