Law Times

December 8, 2014

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/428432

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 15

Page 4 December 8, 2014 • Law Times www.lawtimesnews.com Lawyer who overbilled LAO spared disbarment Hearing panel finds actions unintentional, orders indefinite suspension By yamri Taddese Law Times Law Society Tribunal hearing panel has decided not to dis- bar a Grand Bend, Ont., lawyer found to have overbilled Legal Aid Ontario after concluding his actions weren't intentional. "It underlines that there must be some sort of dishonesty, theft or fraud before revocation can be ordered," says Lerners LLP's Brian Radnoff, who represented lawyer William Kennedy. "Carelessness alone should never amount to disbarment; that's not fair in most situations," he adds. "If you're consistently careless and get into lots of trouble, that's a different situ- ation. But for people who have no prior disciplinary record, carelessness should not result in disbarment." Kennedy had told the panel his "sloppy record keeping" and his chaotic life due to his addiction to alcohol were to blame for the $25,000 in overbilling to LAO. In a decision dated Nov. 26, the hear- ing panel suspended Kennedy indefinite- ly until he gets help for his addiction and proves he's fit to practise. It also found the case hadn't met the threshold of miscon- duct needed for disbarment. "Intention is a major consideration in determining penalty," according to the panel's decision. "The allegations in this application do not include intention, fraud or knowl- edge," it continued. LAO filed a complaint to the law soci- ety after it conducted two investigations into 20 randomly selected certificates handled by Kennedy. All 20 files con- tained problems that included double or triple billing as well as other inaccuracies, according to previous submissions in the case. Kennedy billed LAO for contested trials where no trial occurred, seven in- dictment proceedings where the matter had proceeded summarily, and two bail hearings he didn't conduct. In one case, LAO paid him for a matter he worked on as a per diem Crown attorney as opposed to defence counsel. Part of the hearing panel's conclu- sions on penalty last month stemmed from Kennedy's assertions that he also failed to submit some bills to LAO. "It was Mr. Kennedy's evidence that he un- der billed LAO that persuaded the panel to accept his evidence that the overbill- ing was not intentional," according to the decision. "In addition to testifying that he kept no dockets and relied on memory and experience to submit accounts, Mr. Ken- nedy presented court dockets showing attendances for clients that were never billed to LAO." At his penalty hearing in September, Kennedy disputed assertions by law so- ciety counsel that he treated LAO like "a cash machine." He told the panel he didn't keep a re- cord of the time he spent on LAO files and that he used "his best estimates" to charge the organization. He also said his alcohol abuse often clouded his esti- mates and memory of the work he did. In addition to seeking treatment for his addiction, which Kennedy admitted had cost him both personal and busi- ness relationships, the hearing panel also ordered him to pay LAO $12,000 that he still owes the organization. LAO was able to recover the remainder of the funds by clawing back money it owed to Kennedy. Radnoff notes his client is "pleased with the panel's decision and looks for- ward to getting healthy and fit to practise again." Radnoff, who represented Kennedy on a pro bono basis, calls the panel's find- ings "reasonable and fair." His client's ability to repay LAO the amount owing is dependent on his ability to make a living again, Radnoff notes. During his penalty hearing in Sep- tember, law society discipline counsel Elaine Strosberg argued Kennedy's im- proper billing practices were intentional. "I'm going to suggest that your improper billing was deliberate. You billed the tar- iff maximums or close to them because legal aid would pay them," she said. "You knew what the maximum was and you just filled in the blanks," she added. At the time of the penalty hearing, Strosberg acknowledged the panel had discretion to suspend Kennedy but pointed out he hadn't presented a medi- cal report to prove his addiction had caused his misconduct. "We're not a time machine. We don't know if he had alco- holism in 2005," she said. "How can you know? He has every reason to give you a self-serving version of events." In the past, the law society has often disbarred lawyers who bilked LAO. In 2010, it took away lawyer Massimiliano Pecoraro's licence to practise law after finding the lawyer had defrauded LAO out of $30,000. Pecoraro admitted to professional misconduct for knowingly overbilling. In 1989, lawyer Harry Kopy- to lost his licence for overbilling Ontario's legal aid plan by $150,000. There was also Angelina Codina, who lost her licence to practise law after she charged LAO $20,000 for services she never rendered. Codina also received a six-month sentence for the fraud in a separate criminal proceeding related to the same matter. Criminal lawyer John Navarrete of Neuberger & Partners LLP says he agrees with the panel's decision that Kennedy's case wasn't like previous instances of law- yers who knowingly cheated LAO. "The strongest evidence in terms of why there was no intent is No. 1, the fact that sometimes he under billed, or two, the fact that he had no docketing prac- tice," says Navarrete. Still, the case "should send shivers up everybody's spine" about the perils of in- adequate docketing, says Navarrete. "It's one of those cases where all law- yers should look at it . . . and say, 'I've got to be proactive on these things.'" LT NEWS 12-month, part-time, executive LL.M. for lawyers and business professionals Advance your career to the next level! Learn important legal and business concepts that can be immediately applied to better serve your clients. Explore the implications of real-life cases in an increasingly complex global business environment. Acquire in-depth knowledge of how the law interacts with both the private and public sectors. For more information please contact Jane Kidner, Assistant Dean Professional Legal Education at j.kidner@utoronto.ca http://www.law.utoronto.ca/programs/GPLLM.html or visit our website: Untitled-2 1 14-07-14 9:29 AM A

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - December 8, 2014