Law Times

June 20, 2011

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/50224

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 15

Law Times • June 20, 2011 NEWS PAGE 3 Ont. lawyer in trouble over Bermuda conviction Robert Martyn now wants to re-litigate his fraud case at law society BY MICHAEL McKIERNAN Law Times re-litigate the case at his Law Society of Upper Canada disci- plinary hearing. In 2005, a Bermudian jury A found Robert Martyn, now 49, guilty of conspiring to fraudu- lently obtain Bermudian sta- tus, a form of citizenship in the British overseas territories. Doctored birth and marriage certifi cates that falsely traced the family's roots to a man from the north Atlantic island backed up an application for the status by Martyn's father. Martyn, who had been working in Bermuda on work permits, was eventually grant- ed the status on the strength of the claim, although authorities later revoked it after discover- ing the fraud. Martyn's defence team claimed the lawyer's father was the one behind the fraud and that he was as much a victim of the deception as anyone else. But the jury didn't believe that version of events and convicted Martyn, who never testifi ed in his own defence at trial. Now the law society wants to rely on the conviction and a summary of the facts of the case laid out by the Court of Appeal for Bermuda in dis- missing Martyn's appeal as it makes its argument that he en- gaged in conduct unbecoming a barrister and solicitor for his role in the fraud. It's seeking to revoke his licence to practise in Ontario. Martyn's lawyer Ferhan Jav- ed said that "would amount to a denial of natural justice." On June 15, he told a law society disciplinary panel that admit- ting the conviction would be unfair because it would eff ec- tively amount to a fi nding of guilt on the conduct unbecom- ing charge and send the hearing into the penalty phase without giving Martyn an opportunity to rebut the allegation. "Mr. Martyn should not be barred from raising a defence," Javed said. He argued that defi ciencies in the jury system in Bermuda and the circumstances of Mar- tyn's trial necessitated re-litiga- tion. In addition, he claimed that any decision to extend the rules of practice and procedure and provisions of the Ontario Evidence Act to foreign con- victions would be an unprec- edented move for a law society panel. "Th e issue is somewhat novel and requires the panel to probably go into uncharted territory," Javed said. According to Javed, Martyn had the jury process "thrust upon him" because there was no option for a trial by judge alone in Bermuda. As a result, there were no judicial fi ndings Canadian-born lawyer convicted of fraud in Bermuda is seeking to on his guilt or credibility and no reasons for the conviction. Bermuda law also permits the use of standbys, a process ruled unconstitutional in Canada. According to Martyn's fac- tum fi led on May 27, had he committed a similar off ence in Canada, it wouldn't have been a matter under the Criminal Code but the Citizenship Act. was born in Sandys, Bermuda, in 1899. Th e application also included a marriage certifi cate from 1935 that suggested Mar- tin had moved to Ontario and settled there, again indicating his birthplace was Bermuda. Both documents were fakes. "It was obvious that the fa- ther's document was a forgery and could hardly have been According to the appeal court decision, things began to unravel in 2003 when the woman who is now Martyn's ex-wife tipped off the immigration department, which dug deeper into his ap- plication. Martyn was stripped of his status and charged with conspiracy to defraud. At the trial in 2005, the Crown alleged Martyn had mas- It was obvious that the father's document was a forgery and could hardly have been manufactured without the son's complicity. In that case, he could be liable to a maximum fi ne of $1,000 if prosecuted summarily or one year in jail if the Crown pro- ceeded by indictment. But Danielle Smith, coun- sel for the law society, told the hearing panel it should admit the conviction. She noted the Bermudian jury required a higher standard of proof in the criminal case — "beyond a reasonable doubt" — than any hearing panel would require. "Our position is that the criminal conviction is binding and cannot be re-litigated. It would be an abuse of process for him to be allowed to do so," she said. She said the similarities be- tween the Canadian and Ber- mudian legal systems are strik- ing given the Commonwealth heritage shared by both and that there are suffi cient safe- guards in place to ensure trials are fair on the island. "Th is was the criminal jus- tice system in Bermuda, not a kangaroo court," she said. Th e decision not to testify in his defence was Martyn's, she said, and the maximum sentence of two years' impris- onment gave him suffi cient incentive to put his best foot forward in the case. Martyn's defence counsel at trial was a senior member of the Bermudian bar. Th e defence also didn't raise any concerns about the jury during the trial or in his subsequent appeals, Smith said. She argued there's no right to trial by judge alone in Canada and that the practice of using standbys shouldn't be enough to cast doubt on the conviction, Smith told the panel. In any case, there was no evidence they were used in Martyn's case. According to Martyn's fac- tum, he was called to the bar in Ontario in 1990, although he has never practised in the prov- ince. In 1996, he moved to Ber- muda to work with a Canadi- an-owned company based there and lived there with his wife. According to a decision by the Court of Appeal for Bermu- da released in November 2006 and fi led with the hearing, Mar- tyn's father made an application for Bermudian status from his home in Canada in mid-2000. Th e application claimed his own father, Martyn's grandfa- ther, was William Martin, who CYBERBAHN® LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES INSTANT PEACE OF MIND Issuing a claim in Toronto? Filing a motion in Durham Region? Seeking an Injunction in Halton? Need several parties served across Canada simultaneously? We'll do it all for you – quickly, accurately, and efficiently. And every step of the way, you'll know the status of your order. Submit your court filing or process serving requests to us from your personal computer. And use Legal i Link™ to track them 24/7 using your personal computer or BlackBerry®. Check on the statement of claim you've asked us to issue. Print off your Affidavits of Service. All this and more is available through Legal i Link™. NEW – our internal electronic tracking system gives you the details you deserve We've implemented eBoard, a new internal electronic tracking tool designed to monitor and manage your requests more effectively – and give you even more details on the progress of your order. You'll always be confident that your order will be completed accurately and on time. For more information Visit www.cyberbahngroup.com/litigation Or call 416.687.7961, Toll Free 1.877.207.LINK (5465) manufactured without the son's complicity," wrote Sir Charles Mantell on behalf of the appeal court. By August 2000, Martyn's father had been granted status, paving the way for his own ap- plication. He also provided a declaration from his father as- serting that he was domiciled in Bermuda at the time the lawyer was born. By March 2001, he, too, had Bermudian status. Th at allowed Martyn to work without a work permit, purchase property, and hold shares in local companies with- out restrictions. terminded the fraud and that only he had benefi ted from the crime, while his defence insisted it was his father who had made the story up about his ancestry. An arrest warrant was issued for Martyn's father, although he was never extradited for trial. After a 12-day trial, a jury found Martyn guilty. He re- ceived a sentence of six months in jail, but the judge suspended it for 18 months. "In my opinion, the acts of the accused were clever and calculat- ing," Bermuda Supreme Court Justice Carlisle Greaves said in court, according to a transcript. "It was indeed a well-planned and well-executed fraud." Martyn was later disbarred in Bermuda and left the coun- try following his conviction. He now works in Nassau, Bahamas. His appeal, which raised a num- ber of grounds that mostly cen- tred around the judge's charge to the jury, was dismissed in late 2006. Martyn was also refused leave to appeal to the Privy Council in England. Th e law society got involved when a Canadian lawyer, Mar- lin Horst, brought the matter to its attention during Martyn's trial. Horst had attended the University of Western Ontario with Martyn and later became social friends with him while working in Bermuda. "Bermudians take their status very seriously, and it is big news if it is discovered that someone is claiming Bermuda status who does not have it," Horst wrote in an e-mail to the law society in June 2005 that was fi led with the hearing. Th e LSUC panel has re- served its decision on the issue of applying the Bermuda con- viction. Untitled-1 1www.lawtimesnews.com 6/16/11 10:04:31 AM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - June 20, 2011