Law Times

April 14, 2008

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/50533

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 8 of 15

LAW TIMES / APRIL 14, 2008 NEW An online resource tool 1.800.263.3269 Bestcase earlug.indd 1 3/26/08 11:52:01 AM Focus On CLASS ACTIONS Caledonia blockade sparks suit Rule of law issues drive class action BY IAN HARVEY For Law Times L aunching litigation is always a roll of the dice, no matter how strong the players think their cases might be — but when you take on the government the risks are always higher. John Findlay knows it all too well. He's in the midst of a gamble with all the elements of a Holly- wood classic: small-town lawyer reluctantly cast as David takes on the Goliath of the Ontario gov- ernment, in an effort to right a politically motivated wrong in a case that has already scared off seasoned solicitors screaming. Okay, maybe Hamilton isn't such a small town. That's the Hollywood version, and the script doesn't have an end- ing yet, though the first reel has been riveting. Findlay, who has been prac- ticing for 28 years and has four other class actions under his belt, most notably Menegon v. Philip Services Corp. et al., is now driv- ing a class action suit on behalf of residents, contractors, and busi- nesses affected by the blockade of Caledonia by local aboriginals over a land dispute that is drag- ging into its third year. "A group of people ap- proached me about this case af- ter having been to some pretty experienced firms, which do a lot of class actions, [that] wouldn't go near it," says Find- lay, who practises with his wife, Margaret McCarthy, as Findlay McCarthy LLP in Hamilton. "I consulted, as I always do, with my friend John McDon- ald in Cambridge, at McDonald Ross. John and I have a working protocol that if we have a class ac- tion we try and work as a team, but John said he was reluctant because it was the govern- ment," he says. What triggered his ac- ceptance and decision to go it alone was that he lives in the area and his own dis- comfort at the rule of law being ignored. "This isn't about the na- tives — many people in the area are sympathetic with the issues and, indeed, businesses depend on the Six Nations," says Findlay, who, given his background in economics, knows a risks-benefit analysis as well as anyone. "It's a rule of law issue." The Caledonia standoff, of course, is a twisted tale of anar- chy and a political nightmare from which there seems no escape. It began with aborigi- nal protestors from the nearby Six Nations erecting tents and a shack on a construction site on Feb. 28, 2006, claiming the development to be on na- tive land. Within two weeks, the developer, Henco Industries, obtained an injunction ordering the protestors to leave, but they ignored it. A month later, Ontario Pro- Hamilton lawyer John Findlay is driv- ing a class action suit on behalf of residents, contractors, and busi- nesses affected by the blockade of Caledonia by local aboriginals over a land dispute that is dragging into its third year. DD LT RXQTHZI-02 Generic ad 12/28/07 10:39 AM Page 1 vincial Police moved in to clear the site and make arrests, but it only served to aggravate tensions. Within hours several hundred protestors moved in, bringing with them the radical Mohawk Warrior factions. Since then, the dispute has dragged on despite several at- tempts to negotiate an end. It has inflamed local residents, many of whom have been forced from their homes, and there have been several confrontations and many violent incidents. Perhaps no one is more in- furiated than Ontario Superior Court Justice David Marshall, Dye & Durham The most comprehensive and unique combination of office supplies and services available in Canada Dye & Durham is your source supplier ONE yourONE source supplier for dyedurham.ca • Phone: 1-888-393-3874 • Fax: 1-800-263-2772 OFFICE & FURNITURE PRODUCTS Office & Furniture Products • Corporate Promotional Products Printing & Graphic Services • Law Office Essentials Corporate Supplies • Search & Registration Services www.lawtimesnews.com C who issued the court order to remove the protestors. In May 2006 he took the unusual step of calling the parties back to his court, demanding to know why the OPP had not enforced his judgment. Later that summer he went further, ordering an end to all negotiating between the sides until the protestors complied with his original order. The province appealed and had the order set aside. Little else has changed. The community is split and disrupt- ed, several residents have been beaten and often hospitalized by thugs masquerading as "protes- tors," businesses are failing, and the government refuses to take strong action, fearing a repeat of the Ipperwash native protest where a native was shot to death by police in 1995. Though they couldn't have anticipated it at the time, the class action launched June 12, 2006 has gathered mo- mentum with each day the dispute continues. "There are only two roads through Caledonia and Ar- gyle Street and Highway 6, and the protestors shut them down at one time or anoth- er," says Findlay. "There's all kinds of old laws about keep- ing public thoroughfares on the books too." There are four classes pro- posed: the Caledonia busi- nesses who have been affected by the closure of Argyle Street, the occupation by protestors of the Douglas Creek Estates, or the interruption of hydro service; property owners; con- tractors and subcontractors working on the development; and anyone on Highway 6 whose business were disrupted. or activities The case has survived some of the typical initial skirmishes, Findlay says, and the claim against Haldimand County has been dismissed. A similar motion by the attorney general to strike the statement of claim was rejected by Justice David Crane, but that decision is being appealed, further delay- ing certification, says Findlay. The result of the appeal, of course, says Findlay, is more delay that plays directly into the overall government strategy to stall the matter as long as possible. Recognizing the risk of the action, however, Findlay and the core plaintiffs have set up a con- tingency fund, which is solicit- ing donations, in the event the case fails and they are faced with footing the tab under Ontario's costs regime. He says the first $10,000 is being targeted for disburse- ments, and the rest is being administered by a group of trustees. If the case succeeds, the plan is to return funds on a proportional basis to donors plus interest. If it fails, the money will go towards costs. While the prospect of taking on a "deep pocket" adversary is daunting, he says, it's a unique use of the class action process and a route to seek justice that those adversely affected by the turmoil could not have otherwise individually afforded — more so given the resources and position the Ontario government. "It's also an issue of con- tracted policing," he says, noting many small towns policed by the RCMP or OPP are watching the Caledonia developments. Caledonia's policing services are provided by the OPP, but the agency is in fact an extension of the province itself and, as events have shown, its mandate has been politicized. Provincial inter- ests have trumped local interest. The ripple effect has also been economically damaging. "The CAO of Halidmand says the re- gion has lost $35 million in de- velopment," he says. "It's really killed development. That may not sound like a lot, but here it is, and there's another $800,000 in annual revenues lost too." As for the prognosis, he's not naive about his chances but al- ready sees some benefits. "There's a high risk we could get beat up, but if we're success- ful, we'll do well," says Findlay, whose practice is about half liti- gation, with the balance being corporate and commercial with some marine and real estate work. His wife deals with matri- monial. "Though we didn't expect it, taking this on has brought other LT PAGE 9 W e ' r e a y C a n a p d i m a n o a n

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - April 14, 2008