Law Times

November 23, 2015

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/604503

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 15

Law Times • November 23, 2015 Page 11 www.lawtimesnews.com Lawyers concerned about ruling against financial adviser Recent case suggests a trend that even legal counsel could be on the hook BY YAMRI TADDESE Law Times nvironmental lawyers are expressing concern about what they say is a trend of holding company execu- tives personally liable for contam- ination-related orders after the Environmental Review Tribunal upheld decisions against a finan- cial adviser and a lender. The appellant, Alberto Ro- cha, didn't own the property or business where the contami- nation occurred. The tribu- nal nevertheless found he had "management and control" of the company and its finances. "Having considered the totality of the evidence, the tribunal finds, on a balance of probabilities, that the appellant has both manage- ment and control of an undertak- ing or property under s. 157.1(1) of the [Environmental Protection Act]," wrote panel members Hugh Wilkins and Robert Wright. "The Appellant's manage- ment of the environmental issues and the Property overlaps with his financial control. He has had a strong inf luence over decisions concerning the contamination on, in, or under the Property and the plume that create the risk of discharge of a contaminant into the environment." The decision ref lects a trend of broadening the potential for personal liability in environmen- tal matters, says Donna Shier of Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP. "It's very concerning because businesspeople assumed that they were personally pro- tected. This is a trend that demon- strates tremendous insecurity." In Rocha v. Ontario (Environ- ment and Climate Change), Rocha argued his role included translat- ing materials to Portuguese for Manuel Machado, the owner of the companies that operated Au- tochrome Ltd., a chrome-plating business in Oakville, Ont. Rocha argued he explained matters, including environmental ones, to the owner but sought his opin- ion before acting. But the director of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change argued Rocha's role was more than that. "The director argues that the appellant also inf luenced decisions relat- ing to the companies and Mr. Machado through his role as an advisor. The director argues that the appellant was Mr. Machado's source of information regarding environmental issues at the prop- erty," wrote the adjudicators. Gowling Laf leur Hender- son LLP environmental lawyer Mark Madras says that if the abil- ity to inf luence decision-making through an advisory capacity can amount to management or con- trol, lawyers may be in trouble as well. "We as lawyers are advisers, and very often our advice may have a significant inf luence on the decision and that's a very trou- bling concept that if you're an in- f luential adviser, you may be seen to be actually a person in manage- ment or control," he says. "The appellant held himself out to the Ministry of the Envi- ronment and to the contractor as the person overseeing and managing the environmental issues. And very often, lawyers would be the point person with the Ministry of the Environ- ment in negotiations and law- yers might be the point person with the contractor," he adds. Miller Thomson LLP envi- ronmental lawyer John Tidball says that upon reading Rocha, his thought on the appellant's role was that it "looks a lot like what we do." "I'm often the one window to the client," says Tidball, adding Rocha is consistent with a trend in which environmental clean- up and contamination preven- tion trump fairness to the indi- viduals involved. Madras says the case serves as a "cautionary tale" for coun- sel. "I think the lesson here for lawyers is to make clear to the regulator that you're speaking to them in the capacity of counsel and adviser on behalf of the cli- ent . . . and not create documents or a record that might construe you as being the person actually managing the property." Still, Shier and Madras agree that the specific circumstances of the case are important, especially given that Rocha was indirectly lending money to the company via a mortgage. "The appellant's management of the environmental issues and his role as a lender to Autochrome and a beneficiary of the TD SDRSP mortgage underscores the overlap of 'management' and 'control' in applying s. 157.1(1)," the tribunal said. "The appellant was placed in charge of managing the environ- mental issues of the property that create the risk of discharge," it continued. "His financial control is evidenced by his strong inf luence on decisions regarding the known contamination of the property and the plume, and his maintain- ing the first priority of the TD SDRSP mortgage and effectively preventing the companies from seeking and obtaining financing elsewhere to deal with the con- tamination in precedence to the protection of the environment." It's hard to say whether Ro- cha's financial interest is ulti- mately what led to the finding that he had management or con- trol, says Madras. "What the tribunal does say, and I think it's very important, is that there was, as the tribunal put it, a 'unique conf luence of management and financial control.'" Tidball says advisers aren't the only ones facing liability in environmental prevention and cleanup orders. In McQuiston v. Ontario (Environment and Cli- mate Change), a case in which he acted for one of the parties, the ministry issued a cleanup order against the directors of a real estate company that listed a contaminated site for sale in Fort Erie, Ont. In that case, the ministry found the broker, along with an accountant who had power of attorney over the property, had management and control of the site while it was up for sale. "It's a trend that should concern lots of people," says Tidball. LT FOCUS REACH ONE OF THE LARGEST LEGAL AND BUSINESS MARKETS IN CANADA! AVAILABLE ONLINE AND IN PRINT 8JUINPSFUIBOQBHFWJFXTBOEVOJRVF WJTJUPSTNPOUIMZDBOBEJBOMBXMJTUDPNDBQUVSFTZPVSNBSLFU FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT Colleen Austin T: 416.649.9327 | E: colleen.austin@thomsonreuters.com www.canadianlawlist.com Get noticed by the lawyers, judges, corporate counsel, finance professionals and other blue chip cilents and prospects who find the contacts they need for Canadian legal expertise at canadianlawlist.com with an annual Gold or Silver Enhanced listing package. ENCHANCE YOUR LISTING TODAY! Untitled-2 1 2015-10-28 8:14 AM STAY CONNECTED TO YOUR LEGAL NETWORK 2015-16 Atlantic Legal Telephone Directory connects you to your legal community providing accurate and essential legal contact information in all four Canadian Atlantic Provinces. Compiled by the respected legal directories group at Thomson Reuters, you can rely on a directory that grows and expands with your legal community. Each year find new and updated names, mailing addresses, email addresses and phone numbers for lawyers and law offices. Also get quick, easy access to: % Law and Barristers' Societies % Courts of Appeal % Federal Court of Canada % Government of Canada departments % Judicial districts and judicial officials % Incorporated Municipalities % Land registration and information services % The Associations of Land Surveyors % Law Foundation % Provincial government departments % Boards and Commissions % Law Related Services, Institutions and Organizations % University law faculties ... and much more. New Edition 1FSGFDUCPVOEȕ+VOF ȕ- Multiple copy discounts available *Plus applicable taxes and shipping & handling (Prices subject to change without notice) Stay connected with the 2015-16 Atlantic Legal Telephone Directory. Order your copy today. Visit www.carswell.com or call 1-800-387-5164 for a 30-day, no risk evaluation Untitled-3 1 2015-10-28 7:55 AM E

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - November 23, 2015