Law Times

Page 4 March 21, 2016 • Law TiMes www.lawtimesnews.com Judge rules law firm in the clear Litigation began after millions lost in investment scheme BY MICHAEL MCKIERNAN For Law Times A Toronto law firm is off the hook for the alleged negli- gence of an affiliated coun- sel to the firm in a $14-million lawsuit over a Ponzi scheme, aer a judge ruled it could not be held vicariously liable for his actions. Davide Amato, a former den- tist who lost millions in an invest- ment scheme run by notorious Toronto businessman Robert Mander, accused Aylesworth LLP of breaching its fiduciary duty to him during work performed by Peter Welsh, an Oakville, Ont. lawyer who acted as counsel to Aylesworth and was also Man- der's longtime lawyer. e action was part of a slew of litigation that followed in the wake of Mander's suicide in March 2010, when the walls be- gan to close in on his scheme and investors realized the full extent of their losses, estimated at a total of around $40 million. Welsh denied knowledge of the Ponzi scheme in a statement of defence, and none of the allega- tions against him have been prov- en in court, but when he settled with Amato, the former dentist came aer Aylesworth, moving for partial summary judgment on the issue of the law firm's vicarious liability for Welsh's alleged actions and omissions. However, in her March 4 decision on the summa- ry judgment motion, Ontario Su- perior Court Justice Darla Wilson sided with Aylesworth: "Simply because Welsh was counsel to the firm did not impose on Aylesworth an obligation to supervise all legal work that Welsh was doing," she wrote. "Looking at the evidence in its totality, I am not persuaded that there was the requisite nexus between the work Welsh performed for Amato and the firm that would justify a find- ing of vicarious liability." Aylesworth, which has since changed its name to Dickinson Wright LLP aer combining with a Detroit, Mich.-headquar- tered firm in 2011, is still not completely in the clear, however, as the case continues against another lawyer sued by Amato: Julia Dublin, a former partner at Aylesworth. She represented Mander during an Ontario Secu- rities Commission investigation into his business. Amato met with her to discuss legal issues with his company in 2009, and claims she should have warned him about concerns Mander was involved in a Ponzi scheme. However, Aylesworth says neither Dublin nor the firm was ever retained by Amato. Nevertheless, Aylesworth's lawyer, Peter Wardle, says he was happy to fend off the summary judgment motion. "It's an unusual decision, be- cause it's rare that [there's] a vicar- ious liability claim that involves a counsel relationship between a lawyer and a law firm," says Wardle, a partner with Toronto litigation firm Wardle Daley Ber- nstein Bieber LLP. "We were for- tunate in this case that the terms of the relationship were set out in writing, which is oen not the case. So I think for firms look- ing at this kind of arrangement, this decision offers some helpful guidance." Toronto litigator Michael Les- age, who is not involved in the case, says Amato's claim for vicari- ous liability was an "interesting and creative" attempt to "try to reach the deep pockets" of a Bay Street law firm. "ere were probably a signifi- cant amount of uninsured losses, as it's likely the lawyer who settled only had $1 million in insurance through LawPRO," Lesage says. A note attached to Welsh's law society profile also notes that his practice is currently restricted due to the licensee's bankruptcy. Welsh did not respond to requests for comment, but in a 2010 interview with Law Times soon aer Amato's action was launched, he expressed disbelief that he had become caught up in such a big-money lawsuit aer completing a few "mundane" legal tasks for mere hundreds of dollars to do with the corporate structure of Amato's business. ere was no reason for him to suspect the true nature of Mander's activities, Welsh said. "It's hard, if not well nigh im- possible, to advise people about something you know nothing about," he added. According to Wilson's deci- sion, it was 2007 when Amato first became involved in the in- vestment scheme with Mander, who referred him to Welsh. e lawyer handled the sale of Amato's dental practice, and also did legal work for the company Amato set up to funnel money into Mander's scheme, Wilson wrote. Amato claimed Welsh held himself out as a member of Ayles- worth, and that his connection with a prestigious Bay Street law firm lent Mander's entire scheme an air of credibility. While Welsh did have a firm e-mail address and profile on the Aylesworth web site identifying him as counsel, the firm argued that it was clear Amato had hired Welsh alone in his capacity as a sole practitioner, and there was no connection between Amato and Aylesworth. "Even if Welsh exaggerated his relationship with Aylesworth to Amato, there is no evidence that Aylesworth held Welsh out as a member of their firm to Amato," Wilson wrote, adding that Am- ato's assertion that he thought he had hired Aylesworth "is not what could be described as a reason- able belief." An agreement between Welsh and Aylesworth governed their relationship between 2000 and 2010, providing for his use of firm letterhead and terms of re- muneration when he was doing counsel work for the firm. Welsh also had a similar agreement with a Burlington, Ont. law firm, but all other work flowed through his own practice. In their dealings, Welsh and Amato always met at the law- yer's Oakville office, while corre- spondence and bills were always delivered using his personal let- terhead. According to Wilson's ruling, Welsh only ever opened a file concerning Amato at Ayles- worth when the firm's trust ac- count was used to briefly hold the funds of his dental practice sale, but no work was done by anyone at Aylesworth. Wilson found Welsh's rela- tionship to Aylesworth was more "akin to that of an independent contractor than an employee," and that there was no evidence to support the claim that Welsh was working for Amato in his capacity as counsel to Aylesworth. "e firm had no involve- ment or control over Welsh's sole practice; they had no information about the work that he was do- ing as a sole practitioner," Wilson wrote. Lesage says the case is an important one considering the popularity of counsel and refer- ral agreements between law firms and external lawyers. "Lots of lawyers and law firms are interested because it can be win-win for both sides. I don't see that slowing down," he says. LT NEWS We were fortunate in this case that the terms of the relationship were set out in writing, which is often not the case. So I think for firms looking at this kind of arrangement, this decision offers some helpful guidance. Peter Wardle This is more than a phone book. It is your instant connection to Canada's legal network. With Canadian Law List 2016 you have access to: • an up-to-date alphabetical listing of more than 80,000 barristers, solicitors and Quebec notaries, corporate counsel, law firms and judges across Canada • all contact information supplied for the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, Federal Cabinet Ministers, departments, boards, commissions and Crown Corporations • legal and government contact information related to each province for the Courts of Appeal, Supreme Courts, County and District Courts, Provincial Courts, law societies, law schools, Legal Aid and other important law-related offices THE LATEST CONTACT INFORMATION IN A USER-FRIENDLY FORMAT THAT IS BEYOND TRADITIONAL LISTINGS Continually updated by a dedicated team of professionals, Canadian Law List includes value added features such as: • last name first identification in the federal and provincial listings • separate section of corporate law departments for more than 1,250 companies • professional cards of prominent Canadian law firms • International Agency Referral Cards AREAS OF PRACTICE AND ENHANCED LISTING INDEX The enhanced listing index is displayed in bold type with detailed practice information. It also: • lists firms and lawyers that have expanded their practice information in their provincial listing • is organized by areas of practice by province, city and page reference in their provincial listings Hardbound • Published February each year • L88804-765 • On subscription $169* • One time purchase $188* Multiple copy discounts available * Plus shipping/handling and applicable taxes ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY! Call 1.800.387.5164 or visit www.carswell.com KEEPING PACE WITH THE CHANGING LEGAL COMMUNITY FOR OVER 130 YEARS Untitled-2 1 2016-03-16 10:20 AM Our major law firm client has an immediate need in the Energy Regulatory space. The ideal candidate will have at least 12 years' experience in regulation and policy relating to energy and climate change. While a portable practice is ideal, candidates with solid expertise and a track record in energy law, will definitely be considered. To learn more or to apply, please contact Warren Bongard at wbongard@zsa.ca. Ref. #LT24234. PARTNER 1 2 + Y E A R S | T O R O N T O Untitled-7 1 2016-03-16 10:52 AM

• Cover