Law Times

Page 8 May 30, 2016 • Law TiMes www.lawtimesnews.com Should other illegal drugs be regulated? BY YAMRI TADDESE Law Times I f the federal government is ser- ious about an evidence-based approach to drug policy, it shouldn't stop at cannabis when it comes to regulating drugs that are currently under prohibition, drug policy lawyers say. With the new federal gov- ernment, "I think the rhetoric seems to be much more positive in terms of treating drugs as a health issue," says Eugene Osca- pella, a lawyer and professor of law at the University of Ottawa. "If you're honest about treating drugs as a health issue, then you do not use the criminal justice system primarily [to deal with it]," he says. The Liberals are more open to the conversation "because they don't have the immediate, sort of puritanical view of human beings that the Harper Conserv- atives did," says Kirk Tousaw, lawyer and board member of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws in Canada. "One hopes the current government will have a much more rational viewpoint." John Conroy, a criminal law- yer who has acted in numerous cannabis and other drug cases, says that, throughout his career, he's seen governments come to the brink of legalizing illicit drugs but "not having the guts to follow through." But, Conroy says, "I am opti- mistic," adding that the current government is "far more open and transparent about the whole issue than the prior government." Using the criminal law to prohibit the production, import, and export of substances such as cocaine and heroin has been "a colossal failure," according to Oscapella, who says it's only made both the market and the use of drugs more dangerous. "It's caused carnage around the globe in terms of financing criminal and terrorist groups . . . and it hasn't stopped drug use," he says. Oscapella, a co-founder of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, says he's not sug- gesting that drugs such as co- caine and heroin be treated the same way the federal govern- ment is approaching marijuana. Each drug has to be regulated based on its individual charac- teristics, he adds. "Is it a stimulant, is it a hal- lucinogen, is it a sedative? What are the benefits and what are the drawbacks? We got to remem- ber that a lot of these drugs have therapeutic properties," Osca- pella says. "One of the things you have to look at when you're devising regulatory policies is how do we ensure that people can get access to the benefits of these substances while at the same time trying to reduce the harmful use of them." Oscapella admits devising policy based on the unique circumstances of each drug is "much more difficult than say- ing, 'Thou shalt not use and if you do we will punish you,'" he says. "That's a simple solution. . . . the trouble is, it doesn't work." Heroin, for example, could be regulated through a system of subscriptions, according to Oscapella, who suggests a con- trolled usage of the drug under supervision would reduce its danger. If users can get clean with medically safe dosages of heroin with known amounts of potency, they wouldn't have to "shoot up in a dark alley" with greater consequences, he says. Some 110 years ago, people with heroin addiction purchased it the same way they did aspir- in, and a lot of those people were functional in society because they had a clean, safe, and affordable supply of the drug, Oscapella says. According to Tousaw, people with heroin addiction resort to injecting themselves to get a bang for their buck because of exorbitant prices in the under- ground market. "When you make heroin less accessible and you force people into the alleys to shoot up, you create a whole pile of negative consequences that society has to pick up the tab for, and people suffer," he says. Tousaw says prohibition has only increased the danger of the products addicts consume. "I think there's a case to be made that crack cocaine would not exist but for drug prohibition, and in fact, powder cocaine may not exist but for prohibition," he says. "People who were looking for that stimulation may well have stopped at coca tea. Prohibition actually makes the market more dangerous and it makes the product more dangerous." Oscapella says the regulation of drugs such as heroin and co- caine is unlikely to increase the use of such drugs. "The law is not really what determines whether people use a drug. It's not the determining factor; there are all sorts of other factors that determine whether somebody is going to try to alter their state of consciousness," he says. Tousaw says the idea that ille- gality prevents anyone from get- ting access to drugs is "just non- sense." According to Oscapella, even if decriminalizing the use of hard drugs increases usage, there would still be "a net ben- efit" because of the violent chaos underground drug markets are creating around the world. "We need to look at moving away from the use of the crimi- nal law for dealing with many aspects of many drugs," Osca- pella continues. Conroy says moving away from the criminal law to deal with drug use would be a "huge" relief to the criminal justice sys- tem. In addition to drug-related offences, there will likely be a drop in related crimes, he says. "I'm quite convinced that if we treat all [drug addiction] as a health issue, our property crime rates would go down even more," Conroy adds. LT FOCUS ON CRIMINAL LAW Focus Eugene Oscapella says the new federal government speaks about 'drugs as a health issue.' THE MOST COMPLETE DIRECTORY OF ONTARIO LAWYERS, LAW FIRMS, JUDGES AND COURTS. NEW EDITION Perfectbound Published December each year On subscription $80 One time purchase $83 L88804-764 Multiple copy discounts available Plus applicable taxes and shipping & handling. (prices subject to change without notice) Visit carswell.com or call 1.800.387.5164 for a 30-day no-risk evaluation With more than 1,400 pages of essential legal references, Ontario Lawyer's Phone Book is your best connection to legal services in Ontario. Subscribers can depend on the credibility, accuracy and currency of this directory year after year. More detail and a wider scope of legal contact information for Ontario than any other source: • Over 27,000 lawyers listed • Over 9,000 law firms and corporate offices listed • Fax and telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, office locations and postal codes Includes lists of: • Federal and provincial judges • Federal courts, including a section for federal government departments, boards and commissions • Ontario courts and services, including a section for provincial government ministries, boards and commissions • Small claims courts • The Institute of Law Clerks of Ontario • Miscellaneous services for lawyers ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY! Untitled-2 1 2016-04-27 3:39 PM

• Cover