The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario
Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/687723
Minor marks two years as treasurer
BY ALEX ROBINSON
Law Times
A
s a self-described "type
A personality," Janet
Minor says there were
big accomplishments
during her term as Law Society
of Upper Canada treasurer — but
also a number of initiatives that
she would have liked to see final-
ized. Goals achieved?
She lauded the law society's
work to "open up" and engage
more with the public during her
term. Minor says she has worked
to limit the number of in-camera
items in the LSUC's Convocation
meetings
.
A large part of the engagement
initiatives she pursued during her
time as treasurer involved speak-
ing with aboriginal communities
and their leaders in various parts
of Ontario.
Goals yet to be realized?
A racialized licensee working
group, which was created as part
of the LSUC's commitment to
ensure more diversity in the pro-
fession, was one such initiative
that she particularly wanted to see
finalized.
"There is always challenges
that don't entirely work out the
way one might have wanted or
in terms of speed. That's just part
of the political process," she says.
"I'm sad to leave some of that as
I would like to still be a part of
things, but it's also kind and fair
for someone else to contribute
new blood, new thoughts."
In terms of racialized licensees,
the LSUC first initiated the work-
ing group in 2012 to determine is-
sues faced by racialized licensees
and to figure out how to tackle
those issues. The group released
a report in 2015 saying the law
society could be part of a turning
point to advance more diversity
in the profession and the working
group was expected to provide a
course of action in a final report
that fall.
Lai-King Hum, the chair-
woman of the Roundtable of
Diversity Associations, lauded
Court confirms right to sue for unpaid condo fees
BY ALEX ROBINSON
Law times
A
recent Court of Appeal decision
has confirmed condominium
corporations can recover unpaid
fees in court even if they fail to
register a lien against an owner, lawyers say.
The court dismissed the submission of
Ottawa lawyer Claude-Alain Burdet, who
argued that Carleton Condominium Cor-
poration did not have the right to sue him
for nearly $300,000 in unpaid condomini-
um fees from a unit he owned in an Ottawa
building.
Burdet claimed Carleton Condomini-
um Corporation's only recourse should be
to register a lien, but the court ruled against
him, saying condominium corporations
also have the power to sue to recover unse-
cured arrears under a section of the Con-
dominium Act, 1998.
"It cannot have been the intention be-
hind the Condominium Act, 1998 that if a
condominium owner fails to pay common
expenses and for some reason the corpora-
tion does not register a lien, the corporation
is powerless to recover arrears and the other
owners must bear the consequences of the
defaulting owner's non-payment," the deci-
sion said.
"While the lien provisions offer an effi-
cient enforcement mechanism, the Act does
not specifically provide that a corporation
cannot also sue to recover judgment."
The Condominium Act requires own-
ers to pay common expense fees to the
condominium corporation, and if they fail
to do so, corporations can register a lien
within three months that the arrears start
to amass.
Condo lawyers say the decision is sig-
nificant because it confirms that right of
condominium corporations to secure ar-
rears even if they have not registered a lien.
"If for some reason you don't lien with-
in the three-month period, you still have
recourse and can go after a unit owner
through the courts," says Denise Lash, a
Toronto condo lawyer.
"Just because you haven't liened doesn't
mean you lose your right to collect those
common expenses from that unit owner."
In 2009, Carleton Condominium Cor-
poration first started its legal action against
Burdet and a group that owned 21 units in
the Ottawa building.
The corporation registered liens against
16 of those units in 2005 and registered
liens against five other condos in 2009, says
Nancy Houle, of Nelligan O'Brien Payne
LLP, who represented the condominium
corporation in the case.
"One of the reasons for drafting the
claim in such a way was to ensure that the
corporation could obtain relief — via a
judgment — even if the liens were not val-
id," Houle says.
"Fortunately, at the end of the day, all ex-
isting liens were found to be valid."
Houle and her colleagues successfully
argued the corporation had the right to
sue, citing s. 136 of the Condominium Act,
which states, "Unless this act specifically
provides the contrary, nothing in this act
restricts the remedies otherwise available
to a person for the failure of another to per-
form a duty imposed by this act."
On the first day of trial, counsel for the
appellants said none of the defendants
owned units in the building anymore, ac-
ROWBOTHAM RULING
Legal Aid's income cut-offs out of line, says judge P5
ACQUITTED ACCUSED
Not guilty, but still suffering P7
FOCUS ON
Mobile Technology P8
See Results, page 2
See It's, page 2
PM
#40762529
$5.00 • Vol. 27, No.19 June 6, 2016
L AW TIMES
& $#&!&jmmm$cYa[bbWh$Yec
ntitled-4 1 12-03-20 10:44 AM
C O V E R I N G O N T A R I O ' S L E G A L S C E N E • W W W . L A W T I M E S N E W S . C O M
Denise Lash says a recent ruling is important because it confirms the right of condominium corporations to secure
arrears even if they have not registered a lien. Photo: Robin Kuniski
• 40 issues a year covering Ontario's legal landscape
• FREE digital edition and unlimited online access to past issues
• FREE Canadian Legal Newswire, a weekly e-newsletter from the editors of Law Times and Canadian Lawyer
Juror ruling prompts call to look at Criminal Code
BY TALI FOLKINS
Law Times
ith the Ontario Court
of Appeal having
ruled on jurors' use
of extrinsic informa-
tion in a recent case, the president of
the Criminal Lawyers' Association
says it may be necessary to amend
the Criminal Code in order to get a
better handle on the issue.
"You can't say if jurors are or are
not doing this at any level that is ap-
preciable because you only find out
in the rare case where a juror hap-
pens to mention something," says
Anthony Moustacalis.
"Maybe jurors really do obey the
judge's instructions. In my experi-
ence, it seems that they generally
do. But do I really know? The an-
swer is no. Maybe they're Googling
stuff all the time."
The only way to know for sure
and assess the necessity of any
changes to the jury system, accord-
ing to Moustacalis, is to amend the
Criminal Code to allow research-
ers to interview jury members
anonymously about their experi-
ences. "The fact of the matter is
that people are people and they
might not always remember the
limits of what they're allowed to
do or they might stray," he says.
The comments follow the ap-
peal court's ruling in R. v. Farinacci,
a case that demonstrated the ease
with which jurors can now find
information about the defendant
outside of the evidence presented
during the trial. In their ruling on
June 3, a panel of three judges re-
fused to overturn the convictions
of two brothers for possession of the
proceeds of crime and conspiracy
to traffic in cocaine. The brothers,
Lucas Farinacci and Leonard Fari-
nacci Jr., had argued their right to
a fair trial had been compromised
because jurors in the case, with the
help of Google and other sources,
had come across information about
them that hadn't come up in court.
The appeal came about as a result
of a chance event at a coffee shop.
Prior to sentencing but after the
brothers' conviction, someone at the
coffee shop overheard one of the ju-
rors, in a conversation with a friend,
mention that another me mber of
Zero-tolerance conundrum
Lawyers say pendulum has swung too far against accused in domestic violence cases
BY TALI FOLKINS
Law Times
he justice system has taken the idea of zero toler-
ance in domestic assault to such an extreme that
it's unfair to defendants and no longer works in
the best interests of Ontario families, says a 40-
year veteran of criminal law.
It's an opinion, however, vociferously opposed by at
least one lawyer who helps victims of domestic violence.
Leo Adler, of Adler Bytensky Prutschi Shikhman, says the
issue of domestic assault has become "political football" over
the last 25 to 30 years with largely undesirable results.
While Adler emphasizes he doesn't want to diminish
the tragedy of family violence, he says the situation has now
reached a point where police called to family violence situa-
tions are unduly afraid to release the defendant even in cases
that don't appear serious. "Nobody wants to be the person
who says, 'O.K., I'm going to release you,' because you might
be the one in a million or whatever the statistic is who might
end up killing your spouse," says Adler.
"In a lot of these cases, there's no sign of violence, there's no
sign of anything having occurred. You simply have the word
of the complainant. And the person gets arrested and I can tell
you that again in the majority of cases, the police don't even
bother to try to take a statement from the accused, usually the
male. . . . They don't ask because it doesn't make a difference
because they're going to arrest you no matter what."
Bail hearings in domestic violence cases, he says, are "a l-
ways run on the presumption of guilt" and, if the court does
grant bail, it's generally under strict conditions with the de-
fendant required to live with a surety. The result, according to
Adler, is often a divided family with the added financial strain
OBA LAUDED
Association honoured for mental-health efforts P4
CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Bencher candidate calls for expense limits P6
FOCUS ON
Legal Innovation P8
'In a lot of these cases, there's no sign of violence, there's no sign of anything having occurred,' says Leo Adler. Photo: Robin Kuniski
See Silence, page 2
See Bail, page 2
There's no way to know if jurors are doing their
own research on cases, says Anthony Moustacalis.
PM
#40762529
& $#&!&jmmm$cYa[bbWh$Yec
t7PM/P +VOF
Follow LAW TIMES on
www.twitter.com/lawtimes
L AW TIMES
T
W
Juror ruling prompts call to look at Criminal Code
BY TALI FOLKINS
Law Times
ith the Ontario Court
of Appeal having
ruled on jurors' use
of extrinsic informa-
tion in a recent case, the president of
the Criminal Lawyers' Association
says it may be necessary to amend
the Criminal Code in order to get a
better handle on the issue.
"You can't say if jurors are or are
not doing this at any level that is ap-
preciable because you only find out
in the rare case where a juror hap-
pens to mention something," says
Anthony Moustacalis.
"Maybe jurors really do obey the
judge's instructions. In my experi-
ence, it seems that they generally
do. But do I really know? The an-
swer is no. Maybe they're Googling
stuff all the time."
The only way to know for sure
and assess the necessity of any
changes to the jury system, accord-
ing to Moustacalis, is to amend the
Criminal Code to allow research-
ers to interview jury members
anonymously about their experi-
ences. "The fact of the matter is
that people are people and they
might not always remember the
limits of what they're allowed to
do or they might stray," he says.
The comments follow the ap-
peal court's ruling in R. v. Farinacci,
a case that demonstrated the ease
with which jurors can now find
information about the defendant
outside of the evidence presented
during the trial. In their ruling on
June 3, a panel of three judges re-
fused to overturn the convictions
of two brothers for possession of the
proceeds of crime and conspiracy
to traffic in cocaine. The brothers,
Lucas Farinacci and Leonard Fari-
nacci Jr., had argued their right to
a fair trial had been compromised
because jurors in the case, with the
help of Google and other sources,
had come across information about
them that hadn't come up in court.
The appeal came about as a result
of a chance event at a coffee shop.
Prior to sentencing but after the
brothers' conviction, someone at the
coffee shop overheard one of the ju-
rors, in a conversation with a friend,
mention that another me mber of
Zero-tolerance conundrum
Lawyers say pendulum has swung too far against accused in domestic violence cases
BY TALI FOLKINS
Law Times
he justice system has taken the idea of zero toler-
ance in domestic assault to such an extreme that
it's unfair to defendants and no longer works in
the best interests of Ontario families, says a 40-
year veteran of criminal law.
It's an opinion, however, vociferously opposed by at
least one lawyer who helps victims of domestic violence.
Leo Adler, of Adler Bytensky Prutschi Shikhman, says the
issue of domestic assault has become "political football" over
the last 25 to 30 years with largely undesirable results.
While Adler emphasizes he doesn't want to diminish
the tragedy of family violence, he says the situation has now
reached a point where police called to family violence situa-
tions are unduly afraid to release the defendant even in cases
that don't appear serious. "Nobody wants to be the person
who says, 'O.K., I'm going to release you,' because you might
be the one in a million or whatever the statistic is who might
end up killing your spouse," says Adler.
"In a lot of these cases, there's no sign of violence, there's no
sign of anything having occurred. You simply have the word
of the complainant. And the person gets arrested and I can tell
you that again in the majority of cases, the police don't even
bother to try to take a statement from the accused, usually the
male. . . . They don't ask because it doesn't make a difference
because they're going to arrest you no matter what."
Bail hearings in domestic violence cases, he says, are "a l-
ways run on the presumption of guilt" and, if the court does
grant bail, it's generally under strict conditions with the de-
fendant required to live with a surety. The result, according to
Adler, is often a divided family with the added financial strain
OBA LAUDED
Association honoured for mental-health efforts P4
CAMPAIGN SPENDING
Bencher candidate calls for expense limits P6
FOCUS ON
Legal Innovation P8
'In a lot of these cases, there's no sign of violence, there's no sign of anything having occurred,' says Leo Adler. Photo: Robin Kuniski
See Silence, page 2
See Bail, page 2
There's no way to know if jurors are doing their
own research on cases, says Anthony Moustacalis.
PM
#40762529
& $#&!&jmmm$cYa[bbWh$Yec
t7PM/P +VOF
Follow LAW TIMES on
www.twitter.com/lawtimes
L AW TIMES
T
W
Subscribe to Law Times today for $199*