Law Times

Law Times • June 13, 2016 Page 3 www.lawtimesnews.com Man acquitted over Charter violation Court case wages over $10 worth of marijuana BY SHANNON KARI For Law Times A n Ontario Supe- rior Court judge has quashed the conviction of a man stopped out- side a strip club in Guelph with $10 worth of marijuana in his car, because of a serious Charter violation by police. Justice Casey Hill excluded the seizure of just over one gram of marijuana, set aside a convic- tion for simple possession and a $100 fine, and entered an acquit- tal for Brandon Richards in the latest chapter of a legal proceed- ing that began with a traffic stop more than 20 months ago. While the federal Crown was ultimately unsuccessful in its prosecution for possession of cannabis, the province also brought its own application un- der the Civil Remedies Act. It ul- timately managed to keep nearly all of the $25,000 in cash found in Richards' car, based on the gram of marijuana in the vehicle. "This has been Kafkaesque," says Toronto defence lawyer Ben- jamin Goldman, who acted for Richards in his criminal case. "The line between what was done [possession of one gram of marijuana] and the seizure of the money — that is what is galling," says Goldman, in reference to two levels of government taking part in court actions against his client. The defence lawyer questions why the federal Crown took a case to trial involving $10 worth of marijuana. "It was divorced from law, policy, and logic," states Goldman. Guelph lawyer David Doney was the federal agent who prose- cuted the case. He directed ques- tions to Clyde Bond, a former se- nior federal Crown and currently the lead agent for the Public Pros- ecution Service of Canada in the Guelph area. Marijuana possession "is still against the law," says Bond. "We are advised to enforce the law as it applies to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act," Bond ex- plains, adding that there was not a significant expense to the public in this case. Richards, who is black, was stopped at about 1 a.m. on Oct. 4, 2014 by Constable Trevor Hern after leaving a strip club in a rent- ed vehicle with Quebec licence plates. "The officer observed no abnormal driving as he followed the vehicle," noted Hill. The Guelph police officer did not smell alcohol but asked the driver if he had any mari- juana. Richards produced an item wrapped in plastic, which was later determined to be a gram of cannabis. The constable searched the vehicle and found the money in the trunk. At trial, provincial court Justice Kathleen McGowan rejected the defence argument that the vehicle stop was not a sobriety check but a "pretext" to search the vehicle. The fact the officer asked incrim- inating questions without advis- ing Richards first of his right to counsel was a "minimal" Charter breach, ruled McGowan. Hill, in his decision, dis- agreed that the violation was mi- nor. The Superior Court judge noted that the Supreme Court is- sued clear guidelines in Suberu in 2009, about the requirement to notify someone immediately of the right to counsel once they are detained. "Traffic stops are a routine feature of the uniformed police officer. There should have been no legal uncertainty as to the of- ficer's obligations. This is hardly a trivial, technical, or inadvertent breach. The officer's conduct was deliberate and on the evidence, not going 'quite far enough' amounted to a serious violation," wrote Hill. Even though the conviction was ultimately quashed, Bond notes that there was a finding of guilt at trial. "The defence brought the appeal. That does not mean we are going to throw up our hands and undermine the Ontario Court of Justice ruling. It was a reasoned and reasonable decision. Justice Hill had a dif- ferent opinion. That is his right," says Bond. While the focus of the de- fence was on the failure of police to inform his client of the right to counsel, Goldman says there were other issues he could have argued. Racial profiling was not raised at trial or the appeal and Bond says it would be inaccurate and inappropriate to say this was the reason for police stopping Richards' car. "This has nothing to do with the colour of the man's skin," says Bond. Richards was not facing any criminal offence related to the amount of money found in the trunk. The federal Crown did not attempt to have the money for- feited, and two months after the arrest, the provincial court or- dered the return of the $25,000 to Richards. Before that could take place, the Ontario government initiated a forfeiture proceeding under the Civil Remedies Act. Superior Court Justice Michal Fairburn issued a preservation order for the money in January 2015 after an ex parte hearing, based on an affidavit sworn by Guelph police. Fairburn ruled that the provincial court order did not bar the province from at- tempting to seize the money. The details of the affidavit are not public, but in her deci- sion, Fairburn wrote what she referred to as a "small amount of marijuana" was sufficient to show that the cash was the pro- ceeds of unlawful activity. The province says it later reached a deal where a small per- centage of the $25,000 was re- turned to Richards to avoid a full forfeiture hearing. LT NEWS Benjamin Goldman says a case where his client was prosecuted for marijuana pos- session is 'Kafkaesque.' CALL FOR NOMINATIONS The Lexpert Rising Stars: Leading Lawyers Under 40 Awards honour PE[]IVW[SVOMRKMRPE[½VQWMRLSYWIHITEVXQIRXWKSZIVRQIRXERHEGEHIQME 8LI%[EVHWTVIWIRXEXMSRMWXLIGIRXIVTMIGISJEKEPEHMRRIVWGLIHYPIHJSV November 17, 2016EXXLI*EMVQSRX6S]EP=SVO,SXIPMR8SVSRXS 2SQMREXMSRWEVISTIRJVSQJune 10 th XSJuly 11 th 8SRSQMREXIEGSPPIEKYI ERHSVEGGIWWXLIRSQMREXMSRGVMXIVMETPIEWIZMWMXYWSRPMRI lexpert.ca/rising-stars Untitled-2 1 2016-06-08 11:17 AM This is more than a phone book. It is your instant connection to Canada's legal network. With Canadian Law List 2016 you have access to: • an up-to-date alphabetical listing of more than 80,000 barristers, solicitors and Quebec notaries, corporate counsel, law fi rms and judges across Canada • all contact information supplied for the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, Federal Cabinet Ministers, departments, boards, commissions and Crown Corporations • legal and government contact information related to each province for the Courts of Appeal, Supreme Courts, County and District Courts, Provincial Courts, law societies, law schools, Legal Aid and other important law-related offi ces THE LATEST CONTACT INFORMATION IN A USER-FRIENDLY FORMAT THAT IS BEYOND TRADITIONAL LISTINGS Continually updated by a dedicated team of professionals, Canadian Law List includes value added features such as: • last name fi rst identifi cation in the federal and provincial listings • separate section of corporate law departments for more than 1,250 companies • professional cards of prominent Canadian law fi rms • International Agency Referral Cards AREAS OF PRACTICE AND ENHANCED LISTING INDEX The enhanced listing index is displayed in bold type with detailed practice information. It also: • lists fi rms and lawyers that have expanded their practice information in their provincial listing • is organized by areas of practice by province, city and page reference in their provincial listings Hardbound • Published February each year • L88804-765 • On subscription $169* • One time purchase $188* Multiple copy discounts available * Plus shipping/handling and applicable taxes ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY! Call 1.800.387.5164 or visit www.carswell.com KEEPING PACE WITH THE CHANGING LEGAL COMMUNITY FOR OVER 130 YEARS Untitled-1 1 2016-06-09 11:56 AM

• Cover