The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario
Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/722682
Page 8 September 5, 2016 • Law timeS www.lawtimesnews.com Third-party funding helps access to justice BY MARG. BRUINEMAN For Law Times T hird-party funding of class actions is gaining traction in Ontario, fol- lowing a trend that be- gan in Australia about a decade ago. The move sees a funding or- ganization help cover the costs of class action litigation and in- demnifies plaintiffs of any costs awarded against them. In ex- change, the funder receives a por- tion or percentage of the award in successful class actions. A need for a funding mecha- nism was identified leading to the Law Foundation of Ontario establishing the Class Proceed- ings Fund in 1992. Nearly two decades later, private funding or- ganizations started to make their way into the Canadian market. "It just makes good sense as class counsel to spread the risk and, certainly from the plain- tiffs' point of view, being assured that there is somebody there that will cover off their potential cost exposure," says Margaret Waddell, a Toronto-based class action lawyer and partner with Paliare Roland Rosenberg Roth- stein LLP. "It's very reassuring and certainly helps in providing access to justice in the sense that one of the risks in litigating is, of course, the risk of bearing an adverse cost award, which a rep- resentative plaintiff would have." A third-party funder was ap- proved by an Ontario court for a class action for the first time in Dugal v Manulife Finan- cial Corporation in 2011, and a handful have followed since. In Dugal, in exchange for guaran- teeing the plaintiff 's costs, the funder was granted 7 per cent of any settlement, which the court capped at a maximum of $5 million. Class actions funding must always be approved by the court at the outset, prior to any class proceeding, allowing the judge to vet any deal involving a third party and weigh in on the por- tion or percentage the funder receives in return. The role of the commercial funders helps fill the gaps be- tween cases supported by the not- for-profit, self-perpetuating Class Proceedings Fund, says Kevin O'Brien, a litigation partner with Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. Applications made to the fund are not always successful. Both approaches were borne by an identified need. The risk of having to pay ever-increasing awards made against a plaintiff in a failed class action or certifi- cation fell to the plaintiff 's law- yer. With award sizes increasing, there was a hesitation by lawyers to take on cases. "And then you had real is- sues of access to justice because you had people who weren't able to find plaintiff 's counsel to bring their claims forward," says O'Brien. "Someone really needed to fill that gap." Outside funding offers a sort of insurance that the represen- tative plaintiff and their law- yers will not be responsible for damages should a court decide against them. The idea is that those considering pursuing class actions will not be discouraged by the prospect that they may face a large bill should they be unsuccessful in their action. "The economics of class ac- tions is such that they involve risk, and this type of agreement is a way of mitigating or sharing the risk among the representa- tive plaintiffs, the class counsel and a third party," says Aaron Dantowitz, a Toronto partner with Stockwoods LLP. "It takes the plaintiff 's counsel off the hook as well and doesn't put them in the position where they are having to indemnify the rep- resentative claim. "I think it's clear from the early cases that courts were pre- pared to entertain this type of agreement and to approve them on certain conditions." The downside is that the class gives up a portion of the recov- ery amount to the funder. Third-party funding is also seen as a way to help make an otherwise unaffordable case ac- cessible to the class. The idea of class actions is that individual rights and interests may be vindicated collectively when litigating on an individual basis would not be worth it from a financial standpoint, says Arthur Zeilikman of Vaughan-based la- bour, employment and business law firm Zeilikman Law. A law firm may invest years of human resources time as well as a great deal of money to carry a case to its ultimate conclusion. "The funding of class actions can be extremely costly and, as such, important developments in the law may be forgone due to economic factors. Accordingly, third-party litigation funding may provide access to justice and promote development in the law," says Zeilikman. Waddell observes that the process of having a third-party funder involved can have some additional benefit to the plain- tiffs' lawyers. Counsel for the prospective funder also serves as an additional set of eyes on the case and may raise additional points or questions. "It gives you an opportunity to do that and assess those issues the funder is raising and work them through hopefully before you need to deal with them be- fore opposing counsel. I always find it a very useful exercise to do a funding application if only on that basis," she says. Because third-party funders are seen as having a clear role in class actions, O'Brien believes they are here to stay. He also sees the potential for them to take on a standard form, which lays out what provisions need to be put in place so that the class mem- bers are protected. And the message to plain- tiffs' lawyers involved in cases in which third parties are pro- viding funding is that the law- yer does not serve two masters but continues to serve only the plaintiffs. LT FOCUS ON CLASS ACTIONS FOCUS Kevin O'Brien says commercial funders help fill gaps between class action cases supported by the Class Proceedings Fund. CANADIAN LAW LIST 2016 KEEPING PACE WITH THE CHANGING LEGAL COMMUNITY FOR OVER 130 YEARS With Canadian Law List 2016 you have access to: • an up-to-date alphabetical listing of more than 80,000 barristers, solicitors and Quebec notaries, corporate counsel, law fi rms and judges across Canada • all contact information supplied for the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, Federal Cabinet Ministers, departments, boards, commissions and Crown Corporations • legal and government contact information related to each province for the Courts of Appeal, Supreme Courts, County and District Courts, Provincial Courts, law societies, law schools, Legal Aid and other important law-related offi ces ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY! Call 1.800.387.5164 or visit www.carswell.com Hardbound • Published February each year • L88804-765 • On subscription $169* • One time purchase $188* Multiple copy discounts available * Plus shipping/handling and applicable taxes Untitled-6 1 2016-08-30 1:58 PM