The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario
Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/722682
Page 10 September 5, 2016 • Law timeS
www.lawtimesnews.com
Bank cases highlight issues about overtime
BY MARG. BRUINEMAN
For Law Times
T
here was no court deci-
sion, no profound pro-
nouncement from the
bench, yet Fulawka v.
Bank of Nova Scotia has im-
pacted thousands of people di-
rectly and possibly many more
indirectly.
And the class action that saw
one of the country's largest banks
pay out $39.3 million to about
15,000 employees is expected to
open the doors for people work-
ing for companies that have
failed to pay them overtime.
"It is a very important case.
It will encourage more people
to come forward with overtime
class actions and overtime claims
in general," says Andrew Monk-
house, managing partner of To-
ronto labour employment firm
Monkhouse Law. "I see more
employees starting overtime
claims now because there's more
of a knowledge that you can get
compensation."
He says settlements resulting
from certification have proven
they can be worth pursuing.
And for the individual em-
ployee, being part of a class
means that they can still achieve
a sense of justice without having
to be singled out or even requir-
ing them to take an active role.
An individual worker is unlike-
ly to go after an employer while
still employed because of fear of
reprisal.
"It's become more normal
to certify employment cases. I
think that's a good thing for ev-
eryone," says Monkhouse.
Saskatchewan Scotiabank
personal banking representative
Cindy Fulawka, representing the
class, accused the bank of breach-
ing the Canada Labour Code's
minimum standards of overtime
compensation. She also claimed
that the bank was unjustly en-
riched by keeping money that
should have been paid as wages.
The class action was launched
in 2007. Although Scotiabank
admitted no liability or wrong-
ful conduct, the bank did agree
to settle with a compensation
package for its employees two
years ago. The settlement was
updated earlier this year.
Early on, there was some in-
dication that the very threat of
action prompted large compa-
nies to sit up and take notice,
says David O'Connor, a partner
with Roy O'Connor LLP, where
he practises general commercial
litigation. O'Connor acted as
a lead lawyer along with Sotos
LLP and Goldblatt Partners LLP
in the Scotiabank case.
"When we launched both the
Scotiabank and the CIBC cases,
at that time, 2007-2008, I heard
from a number of colleagues,
mostly in the legal profession
but some in the corporate world,
telling me that the fact that the
cases were launched themselves
caused various corporations to
review and re-analyze their own
overtime policies and practices,"
says O'Connor. "So the very
launching of the case may have
had a positive effect on employ-
ers that has gone unseen.
"The ground that we have
plowed with these cases I think
has opened up a new exposure
for employers of corporations
that previously I don't think was
really there."
The same year Scotiabank
was launched, another class ac-
tion was launched against CIBC
involving close to 30,000 people
demanding payment for over-
time. Classification initially
failed, but it was successful fol-
lowing the second appeal before
the Ontario Court of Appeal.
CIBC returns to court in De-
cember for a summary judg-
ment motion by the plaintiff.
In Fresco v. Canadian Im-
perial Bank of Commerce, for-
mer customer service represen-
tative Dana Fresco complained
on behalf of the class, much like
those involved in Scotiabank,
that she was owed overtime.
Attention to the cases has
served as something of an edu-
cation to many on salary who
previously weren't aware they
had the right to be paid for over-
time work. O'Connor says he has
learned during the intervening
years that people feel compelled
to work longer without addition-
al compensation to get ahead, to
not be perceived as a problematic
employee or they're putting in
extra hours trying to hit targets.
Despite the successful out-
come of Scotiabank and the
positive attention it has attracted,
Monkhouse says there's no true
indication that class actions in-
volving overtime will be univer-
sally successful in the courts. In
fact, the message coming out of
certification hearings is mixed.
He points to McCracken v.
Canadian National Railway
Company, which was not suc-
cessful in classification. In the
class action application by former
CN employee Michael McCrack-
en representing about 1,500
workers heard by the Court of
Appeal at the same time as CIBC
and Scotiabank, the court found
a problem with the lack of com-
mon issues making it difficult for
a class action.
Part of the problem in Mc-
Cacken is the issue of misclas-
sification, where many who were
identified as being management
were identified by the defence
as employees and should, there-
fore, be part of the class, result-
ing in more individual issues.
The challenge of misclas-
sification cases is that layer of
individualized assessments that
is required, making it difficult
for a class to proceed, observes
Chris Naudie, a partner with
Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
in Toronto.
"The courts in this trilogy of
cases (Scotiabank, CIBC and
McCacken ) have indicated that
off-the-clock transactions that
are based on systemic practices
are more susceptible to class,
more amenable to class certifica-
tion," says Naudie. LT
FOCUS
David O'Connor says two cases against
major banks for unpaid overtime 'has
opened up a new exposure for employers.'
Gala Dinner and Awards Presentation
,SRSYVMRK'EREHE´W0IEHMRK0E[]IVW9RHIV¯JVSQPE[½VQWERHMR¯LSYWI¯XLMW
IZIRX[MPPTE]XVMFYXIXSXLIVMWMRKWXEVWSJXLIPIKEPGSQQYRMX]
Emcee
.IER'YQQMRK)HMXSVMR'LMIJ0I\TIVX
The Fairmont Royal York Hotel, Toronto
8LYVWHE]2SZIQFIV
TQ'SGOXEMP6IGITXMSR
TQ+EPE(MRRIVERH%[EVHW4VIWIRXEXMSR
Dress: &YWMRIWWEXXMVI
8STYVGLEWIXMGOIXWSVXSWTSRWSVXLIIZIRXGSRXEGX
CarswellMedia.Sales@thomsonreuters.com
Presented by Lexpert, the prestigious Rising Stars Awards Gala honours winners from
EGVSWW'EREHEERH[IPGSQIWPE[½VQERHMRLSYWIPIEHIVWERHHMWXMRKYMWLIHKYIWXWXS
celebrate and network with others who are at the top of the legal profession.
PI\TIVXGEVMWMRKWXEVW
7MKREXYVI7TSRWSV
&VSR^I7TSRWSV ,SWXIHMR4EVXRIVWLMT[MXL
Childview_LT_Sep5_16.indd 1 2016-08-30 9:35 AM
7KHXOWLPDWHVRXUFHIRUWRGD\·VOHJDOSURIHVVLRQ
2QH