Law Times

September 26, 2016

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/730902

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 15

Page 6 September 26, 2016 • Law timeS www.lawtimesnews.com be achieved when people fight for it. This fight has already been underway for years, and it continues. Any tool that can be used to illustrate and attack such a sweeping problem can be a powerful tool, for licensees and allies alike. LT Fixing the judicial mess W hen Justin Trudeau took over, he discovered a huge judicial mess left behind by the previous Conserva- tive government. For the better part of a decade, trials had been cancelled at every level in this country because we don't have enough judges to hear all the legal cases before the courts, or cases being heard end up taking longer than they should. People have been losing faith in our justice system. A Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, which spent the better part of this year study- ing the disaster in the courts, found that the median time to complete a criminal case in provincial court after a charge has been laid is 123 days. That's four months. In Superior Court, it's 514 days. That's more than a year. Some accused spend that time in jail unless they have parole. If they're acquitted, there is noth- ing even approaching an apology for the damage caused. The senators' report was entitled "De- laying Justice is Denying Justice." The message was clear enough. It accused the government of "complacency towards de- lay." The report suggested the government should even try using "shadow courts" — the practice of over-booking courtrooms to ensure a maximum use of space because some trials do take longer than expected. Something had to be done. Something was. The Supreme Court of Canada and Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin called court de- lays "lamentable." They were so fed up that they put a limit on court delays. From now on, 30-month delays will be the limit in su- perior courts. In provincial courts, it will be 18 months. Anything more will be considered "unreasonable" and charges will be automatically stayed against the accused. When Justin Trudeau came to power, he knew that justice would be one of the major tests of his new government. Trudeau looked around his cabinet and picked the best and brightest legal mind that he had. That was Jody Wilson- Raybould. He appointed her justice min- ister and threw all the legal and judicial work he had into her lap. The Senate report indicated the na- tion was short about 50 judges. The judi- cial community called for more judicial appointments right away. Judges and lawyers across the country cried out for immediate action. In the report, it was sug- gested that Wilson-Raybould take "immediate steps" to put in place "an effective ap- pointment system" of judges by making sure judicial va- cancies would be filled more promptly from now on. Wilson-Raybould said she had been working on such a project all summer, but the facts showed she had only filled 15 judicial posts in six months. It was hardly convincing. The senators told her to forget for the time being about her new project for choosing judges because existing delays were "hobbling the criminal justice system." Wilson-Raybould was told by the sen- ators that instead she should grab hold of the list of prospective judges drawn up and vetted by the judicial advisory committees of the previous Conservative government and use that list to select new judges. That would clear up the backlog. Then, afterwards, she could prepare her own new procedures for the appointing of future judges. Wilson-Raybould and Trudeau had known that Supreme Court justice Thomas Cromwell would be stepping down Sept. 1. But when he did step down earlier this month, the Trudeau government wasn't ready with a replacement. It still hadn't found one by last week. Now, the senators are saying they will be working on the shortage of judges all fall and winter and will have another re- port ready in the spring. For the next few weeks, they are in British Columbia and Alberta hearing witnesses. There's been a pleasant surprise. Judg- es are lining up to testify before them. Judges know what's been happening in the courts, and they don't like it one bit, any more than do lawyers and people appearing in court. So, now, we have a Senate committee, judges, lawyers and everybody else in court urging the justice minister and her boss to get cracking on the problem. When the chief justice of the highest court in the land delivers a speech to the Canadian Bar Association ripping into you, it's time to pay attention to what she is saying. The next Senate committee report should be coming out in March. We'll be counting how many new judges have been appointed. LT uRichard Cleroux is a freelance re- porter and columnist on Parlia- ment Hill. His e-mail address is richardcleroux34@gmail.com. COMMENT ©2016 Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or stored in a retrieval system without written per- mission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Law Times disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, com - pleteness or currency of the contents of this pub- lication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Publications Mail Agreement Number 40762529 • ISSN 0847-5083 Law Times is published 40 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. LT.editor@thomsonreuters.com CIRCULATIONS & SUBSCRIPTIONS $199.00 + HST per year in Canada for print and online (HST Reg. #R121351134), $199 + HST per year for online only. Single copies are $5.00. Circulation inquiries, postal returns and address changes should include a copy of the mailing label(s) and should be sent to Law Times One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd. Toronto ON, M1T 3V4. Return postage guaranteed. Contact Keith Fulford at ........... 416-649-9585 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . or fax: 416-649-7870 keith.fulford@thomsonreuters.com ADVERTISING Advertising inquiries and materials should be directed to Sales, Law Times, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON, M1T 3V4 or call: Kimberlee Pascoe ...............................416-996-1739 kimberlee.pascoe@thomsonreuters.com Grace So .............................................416-903-4473 grace.so@thomsonreuters.com Steffanie Munroe ................................416-315-5879 steffanie.munroe@thomsonreuters.com Director/Group Publisher . . . . . . . . . Karen Lorimer Managing Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jennifer Brown Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gabrielle Giroday Staff Writer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Alex Robinson Copy Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patricia Cancilla CaseLaw Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leah Craven Art Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phyllis Barone Production Co-ordinator . . . . . . . . .Catherine Giles Electronic Production Specialist . . . Derek Welford Law Times Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON • M1T 3V4 • Tel: 416-298-5141 • Fax: 416-649-7870 www.lawtimesnews.com LT.editor@thomsonreuters.com • @lawtimes u EDITORIAL OBITER By Gabrielle Giroday Tackling racism I once heard an expert compare racism in Canada to punching a mar- hsmallow. The point was that racism in Canada is not hard-edged but soft and hard to grab, as well as tricky to pin down. It's stuck with me for more than a decade. A report by a Law Society of Upper Canada committee on challenges faced by racialized licensees speaks defini- tive truth to power. "The qualitative and quantitative data the Working Group ob- tained from the engagement process identified widespread barriers experienced by racialized licensees within the legal professions at all stages of their careers," the report says. Its recommendations are being heralded as a good first step — an assessment I think is correct. In my opinion, the most powerful rec- ommendations speak to gathering and sharing data, like the pro- posal that the LSUC require each legal workplace with 10 licensees or more to do an equality, diversity and inclusion self-assessment to give to the LSUC. Lawyers, we know, hold special positions of trust and power in society. Raj Anand, a co-chairman of the Challenges Faced by Ra- cialized Licensees Working Group, says, "The independent research that we did, as well as our consideration as a working group, basically confirmed the anecdotal evidence that we all knew about." Data gives teeth to anecdotal experience, and it provides a strong platform to pursue change. I believe power (and systemic change) is not given freely, but it can The Hill Richard Cleroux

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - September 26, 2016