Law Times

April 3, 2017

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/806166

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 15

Page 8 April 3, 2017 • lAw Times www.lawtimesnews.com Can using act compensate for low insurance payouts? BY JUDY VAN RHIJN For Law Times A s accident benefits de- crease and attendant care benefits become optional, family mem- bers who are out of pocket for the care of a loved one are in- creasingly looking to the pro- visions of the Family Law Act, which allows them to sue for re- covery of damages. "I always say that somebody in a car accident is not the only victim," observes Steve Rastin, managing partner of Rastin & Associates of Barrie, Ont. "The injured person and their entire family are victimized. The pro- visions of the Family Law Act are a tool that can be used to help people." The relevant provisions are found in Part V of the FLA, en- titled "Dependant's claim for damages." Section 61(1) gives the spouse, (including common law spouses), children, grand- children, parents, grandparents, brothers and sisters of a person injured or killed by the fault or neglect of another an entitlement to recover their pecuniary loss re- sulting from the injury or death. Rastin points out that this right exists in addition to the accident benefits system, where payouts have been drastically re- duced as a result of amendments to the Statutory Accident Bene- fits Schedule and Insurance Act, following announcements made by the government in the 2015 Ontario Budget. "I have no doubt that for many people who have a car accident, they find out they are paying money for nothing," he says. "They are put in the MIG [Minor Injury Guideline] guideline, they get $3,500 cover- age, no housekeeping, limited or nonexistent attendant care and income replacement capped at $400. If most citizens knew how little they are getting for how much they pay, they would be outraged." Gino Paciocco of Paciocco & Mellow of Windsor, Ont. says the reduction in motor vehicle accident benefits is why people are depending heavily on the FLA. "FLA claims are a way to get around accident benefits now that they are minimized, and optional benefits are not pursued," he says. "Just about everyone I see has no optional benefits because they are not told about them by brokers, or they don't want to pay more." Charles Gluckstein of Gluck- stein Personal Injury lawyers in Toronto says at one point it was easier to claim the expenses of carers through accident benefits. "It's almost impossible now. The changes have added layer upon layer of complexity," he says. "It's now easier to make a tort claim under the FLA than through the accident benefits system. It is a loss that has been moved from one side to the other." There are two types of claims that can be advanced under the FLA, as outlined in s. 61(2). There are pecuniary claims, be- ing actual expenses reasonably incurred for the benefit of the person injured or killed, includ- ing funeral and travel expenses and a reasonable allowance for the loss of income or the value of nursing, housekeeping or other services provided for the person. There are also non-pecuniary expenses, which is compensa- tion for the loss of guidance, care and companionship that the claimant might reasonably have expected to receive from the per- son. "It's an archaic way of talk- ing," says Gluckstein. "Pecuniary claims are specif- ic to value. Non-pecuniary are non-specific. The relationship has been affected. They are not the same couple or they lost a loved one, which is not an amount you can address." Rastin says when you bring a pecuniary claim for actual ex- penses, you still need to prove it. "If an individual family member has to give up their job to care for their injured loved one, that's a huge case. Even if they are on a modest income, it's a significant financial cost," he says. "But many family mem- bers provide care around jobs or do shift work because they can't afford to give it up. So how big is the pecuniary loss?" In those cases, Rastin says, the family members totally sac- rifice their quality of life. "They give up all their extra- curricular activities. It's not fair if the insurance company says they haven't lost anything," he says. "My answer is, before, they had a robust life." That portion becomes a non-pecuniary claim. "You're not allowed to sue for grief, loss and anger, but for loss of care, guidance and compan- ionship," explains Rastin. "What is the quality of the relationship worth?" Paciocco says when you present a non-pecuniary claim, it's "more of an art than a sci- ence. You are not able to prove actual expenses." To deter people from going ahead with minor non-pecuniary claims, the government intro- duced a deductible. "The wording from s. 61 of the FLA is repeated in s. 267.5 of the Insurance Act, which sets out a deductible for auto accident insurance," says Gluckstein. "This year, the deductible is $18,692.59. People who want to make minor claims are cut out." Paciocco says it makes sense that the deductible wouldn't apply to pecuniary losses, where you can calculate the loss of in- come. And Rastin says when the deductible was put in place, it stopped 85 per cent to 90 per cent of FLA claims. "Now, we open a file in only 8 per cent of cases that come in," he says. "People who are legitimate- ly injured are turned off by the deductible." Even with all these hurdles, plaintiff lawyers often consider the FLA to be the best avenue for redress, given the current legal landscape. Rastin admits to using the FLA regularly. "If I fight for a client, even if I get $10,000 net, that's $10,000 more than they would have got otherwise," he says. LT FOCUS ON Personal Injury Law Gino Paciocco says the reduction in motor vehicle accident benefits is why people are depending heavily on the Family Law Act. FOCUS ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY! Visit carswell.com or call 1.800.387.5164 for a 30-day no-risk evaluation THE MOST COMPLETE DIRECTORY OF ONTARIO LAWYERS, LAW FIRMS, JUDGES AND COURTS Ontario Lawyer's Phone Book is your best connection to legal services in Ontario with more than 1,400 pages of essential legal references. You can depend on the accuracy of this trusted directory that includes the most up-to-date names, phone numbers, mailing addresses and emails so you don't have to search anywhere else. More detail and a wider scope of legal contact information for Ontario: • Over 26,800 lawyers listed • Over 8,500 law firms and corporate offices listed • Fax and telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, office locations and postal codes Includes lists of: • Federal and provincial judges • Federal courts, including a section for federal government departments, boards and commissions • Ontario courts and services, including a section for provincial government ministries, boards and commissions • Small claims courts • The Institute of Law Clerks of Ontario • Miscellaneous services for lawyers NEW EDITION Perfectbound Published December each year On subscription $82.50 One time purchase $86 L7796-5932 Multiple copy discounts available Plus applicable taxes and shipping & handling. (prices subject to change without notice) ONTARIO LAWYER'S PHONE BOOK 2017

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - April 3, 2017