The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario
Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/817029
Page 8 May 1, 2017 • Law TiMes www.lawtimesnews.com Aboriginal approach to child welfare brings results BY MARG. BRUINEMAN For Law Times W hen the Toronto- based Aboriginal Legal Services decided to offer an aboriginal approach to child welfare, it turned to an elder for a name, offering tobacco. A ceremony was held and the elder announced the pro- gram would be called Giiwedin Anang, meaning north star. Like the north star, the Giiwed- in Anang program is meant to provide direction and guidance to people who are lost. "We are trying to help fami- lies, child welfare agencies and other people find their way out of the thicket that child welfare can become and try to find a route out that everyone can be happy with that will actu- ally lead to healthy children and people growing up in places where they are loved and fami- lies who are able to have input into what happens to their chil- dren," says Jonathan Rudin, a lawyer and Aboriginal Legal Services program director. "Our program works in that we allow parents to come to us . . . and we will work with par- ents, regardless of what the child welfare agency wants to do." Currently, the organization handles about 50 to 60 child welfare files per year under what it calls AADR — aboriginal ap- proach to dispute resolution. The approaches differ in different areas of the province. Giiwedin Anang involves the parent meeting with elders to discuss the issues and a circle is held in which all concerned, in- cluding the child welfare agency, participate. A volunteer "auntie" works with the child to identify their needs and may take part in the circle. Teenage children may participate, too. Together, and through a se- ries of circles, they work toward a resolution, which usually in- volves helping to mend relation- ships. Rudin says the program, the first of its kind in an urban setting, has been quite success- ful in diverting cases from the court system. He stresses the need for a dif- ferent approach to child welfare involving aboriginal children. "In Canada right now, there are more aboriginal kids in care than [there] are not aboriginal kids in care, which is staggering, given that aboriginal people are four per cent of the population," he says. Usually, he adds, when ab- original children are removed from the home, it is not for abuse but rather neglect — the child is not being cared for properly. Some of the issues, he adds, are tied, historically, to intergen- erational impact of residential schools and people growing up not having known parents or parenting. Thunder Bay, Ont.-based Nishnawbe-Aski Legal Services Corporation operates a similar program it calls Talking To- gether, although it is very rural, taking in communities across northern Ontario. Lawyer Celina Reitberger, executive director of the firm, says the challenge is magnified by the vast number of aborigi- nal children that are apprehend- ed and the limited resources available to employ alternative approaches. She points to a recent case of a woman two days away from giving birth who was told that the child would be apprehended shortly after birth, following its two elder siblings into other homes. "To me, this is one of the most cruel things you can do to a mother," says Reitberger. "We immediately sprung into ac- tion." Following a Talking Togeth- er Circle, it was decided that the mom and her baby would go to a facility away from the fa- ther and his history of spousal abuse. Four Talking Together facili- tators cover 45,000 people in 49 communities in the Nishnawbe Aski Nation territory, which stretches across much of north- western Ontario from the Man- itoba border north to Hudson Bay and James Bay. Reitberger hopes to secure funding to double the number of facilitators. "We do a lot, but there's more," she says. Within that area, there are a variety of alternative approach- es to keep the child in the com- munity. One involves the use of cus- tomary care, considered a tradi- tional way of dealing with child/ family issues where the child isn't taken away. Instead, workers go into the community to find someone who can help, which may in- volve taking the child into their home without going through the formal fostering process. Kinship is a co-parenting approach for households ex- periencing problems that don't call for the removal of the child. That sees another member of the community help the parent within the home. But Reitberger is concerned that children continue to be ap- prehended from some northern communities and sent into fos- ter homes in Southern Ontario, never to return to their home communities. "We feel that every case should go to ADR, and it's not happening," she says. University of Ottawa law professor Sébastien Grammond focuses on aboriginal issues, and he says aboriginal child welfare diversion programs often allow communities to re- turn to more traditional ways or be inspired by them to resolve conf licts. "The traditional system has produced an overrepresentation of aboriginal children in the child welfare system. "The Truth and Reconcilia- tion Commission said in a way the current system is replicating in some aspects the residential schools insofar as it is a tool for removing aboriginal children from their families and from their communities," he says. LT FOCUS ON Aboriginal Law Sébastien Grammond says aboriginal child welfare diversion programs often allow communities to return to more traditional ways or be inspired by them to resolve conflicts. FOCUS Nominations close May 5 V i s i t WWW.CANADIANLAWYERMAG.COM/SURVEYS f o r d e t a i l s Nominate your choices for Canada's most infl uential lawyers Untitled-5 1 2017-04-18 8:41 PM