Law Times

August 7, 2017

The premier weekly newspaper for the legal profession in Ontario

Issue link: https://digital.lawtimesnews.com/i/857884

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 15

Page 10 August 7, 2017 • LAw times www.lawtimesnews.com Decision affirms independence of sports organizations BY MICHAEL MCKIERNAN For Law Times A recent Superior Court decision shows sports organizations should be left to their own de- vices when it comes to matters of internal governance, says a To- ronto lawyer. In Cricket Canada v. Bilal Syed, Justice Freya Kristjanson overturned parts of an arbitra- tor's decision that imposed new bylaws on the sport's governing body in the country following a disputed board election. Jordan Goldblatt, partner at Adair Barristers LLP who acted for Cricket Canada, says his cli- ents were pleased with the result. "I think the lesson here is that, ultimately, what organiza- tions are permitted to do under their bylaws is a decision that is best left to members," he says. Goldblatt says if the arbitra- tor's decision had been endorsed, it had the potential to cause cha- os within Cricket Canada or any other organization where the membership objects, either im- mediately or at some point in the future, to bylaw changes they are directed to make. "What are you supposed to do in a situation where the arbitra- tor says one thing and the mem- bers say that no, they don't like the bylaws imposed on them? It creates uncertainty," he adds. Sports lawyer John Polyzogo- poulos, partner at Blaney Mc- Murtry LLP, says the decision is the latest in a line that suggests courts will be hesitant to get in- volved in the inner workings of corporations. "It's not the court's role to second-guess the internal gov- ernance of organizations," says Polyzogopoulos. "That's where the arbitrator went offside. It wasn't his job to criticize or require changes to the existing bylaws. It's his and the court's job to look at the rules that are already in place, interpret them and determine whether they have been applied fairly in the case before them." The dispute has its roots in Cricket Canada's 2016 annual general meeting, when a fresh slate of directors is normally elected by the corporation's members — provincial subsid- iaries that administer the game in their home jurisdictions. Each provincial group con- trols votes in proportion to the number of teams under its pur- view. Bilal Syed's name went on the ballot paper after he was vetted without incident by a nomina- tions committee appointed by the board. However, when Syed ran and lost in the election by members, he protested the result with a spectacular complaint that al- leged fraud, bias and racism in the process. An arbitrator appointed to rule on the dispute dismissed Syed's allegations of discrimina- tion as lacking evidence, but he did order a new election based on failures in the conduct of the election. For example, he found that the Saskatchewan vote was carried out by the former pro- vincial president rather than its current leader at the time of the election. In addition, the arbitrator ex- pressed his discomfort with oth- er "improprieties" in the election process, and he directed Cricket Canada to make "all necessary amendments" to its bylaws to address his concerns. He said the election rules should bar anyone with a role in selecting the nominations com- mittee from running and force provincial directors to resign those posts before seeking elec- tion to the national board. Final- ly, he said nominees should be banned from offering or prom- ising benefits to voters. Goldblatt says the election was rerun in accordance with the arbitrator's award, even as Cricket Canada challenged his jurisdiction to make them, and Syed, who could not be reached by Law Times, was again unsuc- cessful. In her May 30 decision, Krist- janson found all three of the ar- bitrator's suggestions were core issues of internal governance that fell "outside the scope of the arbitration agreement" and were "beyond the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator." The judge also set aside the arbitrator's direction to amend the organization's bylaws. "It is for the members to decide on changes to Cricket Canada's By-laws, policies and procedures. Such changes are properly the subject of nego- tiation, consultation and input from all stakeholders and votes by the members, and not the unilateral decision of an arbitra- tor in a sports-related dispute regarding the participation of an individual in an election," Krist- janson wrote. Polyzogopoulos says he has seen "some or all" of the arbitra- tor's directed bylaw changes in practice at other sports organi- zations. "But every corporation is different, and I don't know that there is one cookie-cutter ap- proach that works for everyone. It's going to depend on the na- ture of the particular organiza- tion and the desires of its mem- bers," he says. "They are the kinds of chang- es that should be looked at case by case." Mark Blumberg, partner with Toronto firm Blumberg Segal LLP, who works almost ex- clusively with charities and non- profits, says governance disputes are relatively commonplace within entities incorporated un- der the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act but that it's rarer to see them make it all the way to court. "A lot of them go nowhere, and people just get upset and leave," Blumberg says. LT FOCUS John Polyzogopoulos says a recent Superior Court decision is the latest in a line that suggests courts will be hesitant to get involved in the inner workings of corporations. NO TRANSFORMATION WITHOUT INSPIRATION The Canadian Lawyer InHouse Innovatio Awards celebrate in-house counsel, both individuals and teams, who have found ways to show leadership by becoming more efficient, innovative and creative in meeting the needs of their organizations within the Canadian legal market. Date: Sept. 19, 2017 Location: Arcadian Court, Toronto 6 p.m. Cocktail Reception 7 p.m. Gala Dinner and Awards Presentation Emcee: Jennifer Brown, Managing Editor, Canadian Lawyer InHouse/Law Times Dress: Business Attire To book your seats or to inquire about sponsorship, contact us at 416-649-8841 or MediaSolutions.Sales@thomsonreuters.com www.innovatio-awards.com HOSTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH BRONZE SPONSOR BRONZE SPONSOR COCKTAIL SPONSOR PLATINUM SPONSOR GOLD SPONSOR GOLD SPONSOR Untitled-3 1 2017-07-27 2:37 PM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Law Times - August 7, 2017