Law Times

Page 4 OctOber 23, 2017 • Law times www.lawtimesnews.com Report found racialized lawyers face barriers LSUC statement of principles faces some backlash BY ALEX ROBINSON Law Times T he Law Society of Up- per Canada will not im- pose a penalty on law- yers for not complying with its statement of principles requirement this year, but the regulator is not ruling out doing so in the future. The new requirement has faced some backlash from the profession since it was recently introduced as part of an initia- tive to tackle the barriers faced by racialized licensees. It requires all licensed law- yers and paralegals to write a statement of principles acknow- ledging their obligation to pro- mote equality, diversity and in- clusion. Opponents have said the re- quirement amounts to policing thought and that it imposes be- lief on lawyers. "It's offensive in my view be- cause it's requiring lawyers to make a statement as to their be- liefs," says Bencher Sidney Trois- ter, who voiced concern over the requirement when Convocation approved it in December. "Judge me by my conduct — not by a statement of principles that may or may not be what I actually believe," he adds. Bencher Joe Groia has also submitted a motion asking Convocation to reconsider the statement of principles and re- questing that conscientious objectors be exempt from the requirement. The new requirement means lawyers will have to check a box on their annual reports that they completed the requirement. Lawyers do not have to sub- mit the statement to the law society, but it is mandatory to write it. LSUC Treasurer Paul Schabas says those that do not check off that box will not re- ceive a penalty this year, but they will likely receive a letter from the law society noting they are not in compliance. He stresses that this is just the beginning of the process and that it remains to be seen whether there will be penalties for non-compliance in later years. "We will wait and see wheth- er there will be sanctions down the road for this, but as I said, this is not our objective at this time," Schabas says. He adds that the law society is looking to have a positive and proactive approach to the re- quirement at this point. "This is a conduct obliga- tion to recognize that we have to commit to these values and it's not a speech obligation or a thought obligation," he says. "It's an obligation to promote equality, diversity and inclu- sion generally, which is nothing more than the obligation law- yers have already." Supporters of the require- ment say that the statement of principles are important as there is a lack of acknowledge- ment in the legal profession that there are barriers that exist for racialized lawyers. Hassan Ahmad, a lawyer with Koskie Minsky LLP, says the criticism that the statement is receiving is not necessary, as the way the requirement is writ- ten is fairly benign. At the end of the day, Ahmad says, a statement on a piece of paper is not necessarily going to change very much. "What's really going to change matters is the actions and the intentions and the way we behave as lawyers within so- ciety," he says. Troister says imposing the statement of principles is also inconsistent with Convoca- tion's 2014 decision to refuse accreditation to a proposed law school by Trinity Western Uni- versity. In that matter, which is go- ing before the Supreme Court of Canada this fall, the law so- ciety voted against accredit- ation because of a provision in the school's covenant that bans students from "sexual intimacy" with someone of the same sex. "Are they just picking and choosing which statements of principles they like and which ones they don't like?" says Trois- ter. Some lawyers are now saying they will not comply with the statement of principles require- ment. Criminal defence lawyer Hans John Kalina, who intends not to comply, says the require- ment is contrary to s. 2(a) of the Charter, which protects freedom of conscience and reli- gion. He says it also goes against s. 2(b) by imposing a belief upon lawyers. "My issue is not with the con- tent of the principles, as laudable as they are, it is with the require- ment that they are imposed be- liefs," Kalina says. "This is no different than the law society imposing upon me the requirement that I must believe in god or a specific reli- gion." Kalina also questions how subscribing to a statement of principles would affect his abil- ity to defend people accused of heinous crimes if doing so con- f licts with those principles. Bencher Joe Groia has also submitted a motion asking Convocation to reconsider the statement of principles and re- questing that conscientious objectors be exempt from the requirement. Convocation approved the requirement in December as part of a package of 13 recom- mendations in its report about the challenges faced by racial- ized licensees. The report found racialized lawyers experience widespread barriers at all stages of their ca- reers. Troister put forward a mo- tion at the December meeting that would break up the recom- mendations so they could be voted on separately, but that was voted down. At the time, Troister questioned why the package was being voted on in an all-or- nothing approach when there were parts that some benchers found problematic. He said that putting them all together as a package would mean the nuances of certain recommendations would be overlooked. "If the recommendations are so sound, what is the fear of looking at them separately?" Troister said at the time. Those who opposed voting on the recommendations on a piecemeal basis said that the package did not go far enough as it was and that they support- ed the recommendations under the understanding they would all be approved together. Supporters also said that all the individual parts were meant to work together to tackle the problems identified in the re- port. Benchers unanimously passed the entire package of recommendations with three benchers abstaining. LT NEWS NEWS NEWS Hassan Ahmad says the criticism that the statement of principles is receiving is not necessary, as the way the requirement is written is fairly benign. S.N.King Bookkeeping Services Law office specialist, PCLaw, LSUC audits, payroll, LSUC and tax reports. (905) 409-9109 sueking1234@gmail.com LAW TIMES Marketplace 10th ANNUAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Toronto • Webinar | December 5 2017 COURSE LEADERS Walied Soliman, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP Orestes Pasparakis, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP COURSE HIGHLIGHTS • Update from the Toronto Stock Exchange • Update from the Ontario Securities Commission • Human Rights, Economic, Social and Corporate Governance – the Next Frontier • Update on Proxy Practice and Case Law • Update on ISS/Glass Lewis Practice • Trends in Boardroom Diversity • Future Developments in Corporate Governance DATE & LOCATION Toronto: December 5, 2017 Vantage Venues 150 King St West, 27th Floor, Toronto, ON M5H 1J9 *Discount applies to in-class only FOR QUESTIONS AND GROUP RATES, PLEASE CONTACT: Toll-Free: 1-877-298-5868 • Direct: 416-609-5868 Fax: 416-609-5841 • Website: cpdcentre.ca Email: lexpert.questions@thomsonreuters.com Register online at www.lexpert.ca/$PSQ(PWFSOBODF EARLY BIRD ENDS NOV. 6* Untitled-3 1 2017-10-18 10:12 AM www.twitter.com/lawtimes Follow on

• Cover